ArticleOncology letters2019
Application value of laparoscopy in radical mastectomy and omental breast reconstruction.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopically Harvested Pedicled Omental Flap in Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Gynecological Cancer: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction using omental flaps: A systematic review.JPRAS open · 2024Review
- Verification of Volume Similarity Between Unilateral Mammary Gland and Autologous Omentum in Adult Women by Measuring Cylinder Method.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application value of laparoscopy in radical mastectomy and omental breast reconstruction was explored. The medical records of 104 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and omental breast reconstruction from July 2015 to August 2017 in Inner Mongolia Xing'an League People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-three patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were the experimental group and 51 patients undergoing open surgery were the control group. The surgery conditions, upper limb function, postoperative complications, volume similarity between unilateral subcutaneous glands and autologous omentum, cosmetic excellent rate and treatment satisfaction were observed. The surgical duration of the patients in the experimental group was significantly longer than that in the control group, but the intraoperative blood loss was less and hospital stay was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). The improvement of upper limb function in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). The cosmetic excellent rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.001). The satisfaction degree of patients in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.001). Filling the autologous omentum while excising the unilateral mammary gland is an equivalent replacement, which can make the appearance of the breast on the operation side similar to that on the healthy side, thus improving the excellent rate of breast beauty and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.