Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289509›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Clinical effectiveness of combined interventional therapy as a salvage modality for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

Sushant Kumar Das, Jin Liang Wang, Bing Li, Chuan Zhang, Han Feng Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sushant Kumar DasDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P.R. China.
Jin Liang WangDepartment of Radiology, Pingdingshan Fifth People's Hospital, Pingdingshan, Henan 467000, P.R. China.
Bing LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P.R. China.
Chuan ZhangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P.R. China.
Han Feng YangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, P.R. China.
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNPingdingshan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although different treatment methods have been introduced to treat advanced pancreatic carcinoma, the median overall survival rate remains unsatisfactory. Theoretically, combining different treatment methods should work in synergy to enhance locoregional disease control and improve survival. Therefore, the aim of the present retrospective study was to analyze the effectiveness of combined interventional therapy compared with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or chemotherapy alone for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. A total of 266 patients who were undergoing treatment for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma between July 2012 and November 2015 were included in the current study. The tumor responses and 3-year overall survival rates of patients treated with combined interventional therapy (TACE combined with iodine-125 seed implantation and/or radiofrequency ablation; CIT group; n=84) were compared with those of patients treated with TACE alone (TACE group; n=59), as well as patients treated with systemic chemotherapy alone (control group; n=123). Patients in the CIT group exhibited significantly improved tumor responses compared with patients in the TACE group (51.89 vs. 30.61%; P=0.028) or control group (51.89 vs. 17.20%; P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival rate of the CIT group was also significantly higher compared with that of the TACE and control groups (P=0.0116 and P=0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, the CIT group exhibited a significantly higher overall survival rate for patients with unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer compared with the TACE and control groups (P=0.0088 and P<0.0001, respectively), which suggests that a combination of different interventional techniques increases the survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. No life-threatening complications were observed in any treatment group. In conclusion, combined interventional therapy exhibits a good efficacy and an improved survival rate for unresectable pancreatic cancer compared with TACE alone.

Indexed as

iodine-125 radioactive seedspancreatic carcinomaradiofrequency ablationtrans-arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID31289509
PMCPMC6539718
OpenAlexW2944248760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.