ArticleOncology letters2019
Prognosis and treatment differences between initial and second primary chondrosarcoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advantages of gross total resection in patients with astrocytoma: A population-based study.Oncology letters · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognosis and treatment differences between initial and second primary chondrosarcoma (pCS) remain unknown. In the present study, patients with chondrosarcoma diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 were identified using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality. In total, 1,655 eligible patients were included in the cohort of the present study, of which, 1,455 (87.9%) had initial pCS and 200 (12.1%) had second pCS. Patients with second pCS were more frequently diagnosed in the age range of 61-80 years compared with patients with initial pCS (52.5 vs. 43.1%; P<0.001). The OS rate of patients with initial pCS was significantly higher than that of patients with second pCS (78.3 vs. 63.0%; P<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analyses suggested that second pCS predicted higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.26, P<0.001) compared with that in patients with initial pCS. Furthermore, there were no differences observed in the treatment benefits between the patients with initial and second pCS. In conclusion, second pCS was more frequently diagnosed in older patients compared with initial pCS. In addition, the prognosis of patients with second pCS was worse than that of patients with initial pCS, and the treatment is essentially the same for initial and second pCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.