ArticleOncology letters2019
Application value of MRI diffuse weighted imaging combined with PET/CT in the diagnosis of stomach cancer at different stages.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A retrospective analysis of Gastric Cancer Lymph Nodes Based on Groups, Regions, and Stages.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a LASSO Prediction Model for Better Identification of Ischemic Stroke: A Case-Control Study in China.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Value of MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI DWI) combined with PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of stomach cancer (SC) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 160 patients with SC diagnosed by pathological biopsy in The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University from March 2015 to April 2018. The values of MRI DWI, PET/CT and combined diagnosis in the diagnosis and staging of SC were compared according to the criteria of diagnosis of postoperative pathological or clinical comprehensive evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of MRI DWI in the diagnosis of SC at stage I-II were 61.05, 64.62 and 62.50%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of PET/CT (P<0.05). Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of MRI DWI in the diagnosis of SC at stage III-IV were lower than those of PET/CT (P<0.05). Sensitivity and diagnostic coincidence rate of MRI DWI combined with PET/CT in the diagnosis of SC at stage I-II were significantly higher than those of MRI DWI or PET/CT alone (P<0.05). Specificity and diagnostic coincidence rate of MRI DWI combined with PET/CT in the diagnosis of SC at stage III-IV were significantly higher than those of MRI DWI or PET/CT alone (P<0.05). PET/CT is superior to MRI DWI in SC staging, whereas the diagnostic efficiency of combined scan is much higher than that of PET/CT or MRI DWI alone. In order to obtain more accurate preoperative staging and to avoid diagnostic exploratory laparotomy, the combination of MRI DWI and PET/CT techniques should be used in the comprehensive analysis of the disease to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.