Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289464›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2019

Amplification of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements and the associated impact on gene regulation and alternative splicing in mulberry (

Youchao Xin, Bi Ma, Zhonghuai Xiang, Ningjia He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Combination of Start-Codon-Targeted (SCoT) andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mobile DNA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Youchao XinState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715 China.
Bi MaState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715 China.
Zhonghuai XiangState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715 China.
Ningjia HeState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMiniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) are common in eukaryotic genomes, and are important for genomic evolution.

resultsIn the present study, the identification of MITEs in the mulberry genome revealed 286,122 MITE-related sequences, including 90,789 full-length elements. The amplification of mulberry MITEs and the influence of MITEs on the evolution of the mulberry genome were analyzed. The timing of MITE amplifications varied considerably among the various MITE families. Fifty-one MITE families have undergone a single round of amplification, while the other families developed from multiple amplifications. Most mulberry MITEs were inserted near genes and some could regulate gene expression through small RNAs. An analysis of transgenic plants indicated that MITE insertions can upregulate the expression of a target gene. Moreover, MITEs are frequently associated with alternative splicing events (exonizations).

conclusionThe data presented herein provide insights into the generation of MITEs as well as their impact on gene regulation and evolution in mulberry.

Indexed as

Alternative splicingAmplificationGene expressionMITEsSmall RNA

Identifiers

PMID31289464
PMCPMC6593561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.