Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289428›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Experimentally induced antipredator responses are mediated by social and environmental factors.

Frank Groenewoud, Sjouke A Kingma, Kat Bebbington, David S Richardson, Jan Komdeur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Experimentally induced antipredator responses are mediated by social and environmental factors.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank GroenewoudBehavioural Physiology and Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, CC Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5490-086X
Sjouke A KingmaBehavioural Physiology and Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, CC Groningen, the Netherlands.
Kat BebbingtonCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7714-9100
David S RichardsonCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Jan KomdeurBehavioural Physiology and Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, CC Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nest predation is a common cause of reproductive failure for many bird species, and various antipredator defense behaviors have evolved to reduce the risk of nest predation. However, trade-offs between current reproductive duties and future reproduction often limit the parent's ability to respond to nest predation risk. Individual responses to experimentally increased nest predation risk can give insights into these trade-offs. Here, we investigate whether social and ecological factors affect individual responses to predation risk by experimentally manipulating the risk of nest predation using taxidermic mounts in the cooperative breeding Seychelles warbler (

Indexed as

antipredator defensenest defensenest predationparental investmentSeychelles warblertrade-off

Identifiers

PMID31289428
PMCPMC6606998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.