Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289422›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment2019

Reliability and validity of the Thinking Skills Inventory, a screening tool for cross-diagnostic skill deficits underlying youth behavioral challenges.

Lu Wang, Alisha R Pollastri, Pieter J Vuijk, Erin N Hill, Brenda A Lee, Anna Samkavitz, Ellen B Braaten, J Stuart Ablon, Alysa E Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lu Wang *Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Alisha R Pollastri *Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Pieter J VuijkDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Erin N HillDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Brenda A LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Anna SamkavitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ellen B BraatenDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Stuart AblonDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Alysa E DoyleDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

Psychosis risk variants and cognitive control in clinically-referred youthR03MH106862 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DOYLE, ALYSA E · 2015 to 2016
$249k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH106862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deficits in a range of skill domains (including executive functioning, emotion regulation, social cognition and language/communication) are associated with disrupted youth behavior and functioning across mental health diagnoses. The identification of skill deficits are important for effective treatment planning, particularly for personalized interventions. While there are multiple ways to assess these skills, parent/caregiver reports represent an important information source. To date, no single, brief measure has been developed that gathers parent/caregiver ratings across this range of constructs. We have developed a short caregiver-report questionnaire (the Thinking Skills Inventory; TSI), to screen for skill deficits. Here, we examine the reliability and validity of this rating scale in 384 youth who were consecutively referred for neuropsychiatric evaluation. A primary caregiver completed the TSI as well as other established measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support five subscales on the TSI: Attention and Working Memory, Language and Communication, Emotion Regulation, Cognitive Flexibility, and Social Thinking Skills. The subscales showed moderate to high internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas range from 0.84 to 0.91). Correlations with established caregiver-report measures confirm their convergent and discriminant validity, and associations with multiple clinical diagnoses and cross-diagnostic aggressive behavior further support the utility of the scale for our intended purpose. In sum, this free, brief measure is a valid and reliable way to identify variation in skill domains relevant to a range of psychopathology. The TSI may be useful in youth mental health settings to assist with treatment planning and to inform referral for further evaluation.

Indexed as

assessmentchild psychopathologyCollaborative Problem Solvingcross-diagnostic traits

Identifiers

PMID31289422
PMCPMC6615748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.