ArticleNature2019
Self-destructing mosquitoes and sterilized rodents: the promise of gene drives.
Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- From designer babies to edited food: comparing public attitudes toward CRISPR technology and gene editing in Japan and the United States.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Culturally Grounded Method for Dialogue Between Indigenous Peoples and Researchers on Emerging Technologies: Lessons from the Gene Drive Context.Gates open research · 2026Article
- Talking About Gene Drive in Uganda: The Need for Science Communication to Underpin Engagement.Science communication · 2024Article
- Genes drive organisms and slippery slopes.Pathogens and global health · 2024Review
- Navigating biosafety regulatory frameworks for genetic engineering in Africa: a focus on genome editing and gene drive technologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Validation of CRISPR activation system inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Article
- Larval mosquito management and risk to aquatic ecosystems: A comparative approach including current tactics and gene-drive Anopheles techniques.Transgenic research · 2022Article
- RNA Viruses, Pandemics and Anticipatory Preparedness.Viruses · 2022Review
- An Ethical Overview of the CRISPR-Based Elimination of Anopheles gambiae to Combat Malaria.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2022Article
- Double-tap gene drive uses iterative genome targeting to help overcome resistance alleles.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing Contributions and Challenges in Disease Reduction Focused on Malaria.Biology · 2022Review
- Gene Drives in the U.K., U.S., and Australian Press (2015-2019): How a New Focus on Responsibility Is Shaping Science Communication.Science communication · 2022Article
- Applications of and considerations for using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene conversion systems in rodents.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- Control of sheep flystrike: what's been tried in the past and where to from here.Australian veterinary journal · 2022Review
- Gene-drive mosquitoes: a prospect for future malaria control.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Integrative Pre-Breeding for Biotic Resistance in Forest Trees.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Novel CRISPR-Cas Systems: An Updated Review of the Current Achievements, Applications, and Future Research Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31289403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.