Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289293›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Clostridioides difficile LuxS mediates inter-bacterial interactions within biofilms.

Ross T Slater, Lucy R Frost, Sian E Jossi, Andrew D Millard, Meera Unnikrishnan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Comparative genomic analysis ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Community-AcquiredInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Challenges and opportunities of phage therapy forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  13. The current riboswitch landscape inMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Membrane Vesicles of Clostridioides difficile and Other Clostridial Species.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Clostridioides difficile Biofilm.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ross T SlaterUniversity of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Lucy R FrostUniversity of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Sian E JossiUniversity of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0447-5030
Andrew D MillardUniversity of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Meera UnnikrishnanUniversity of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. m.unnikrishnan@warwick.ac.uk.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105627/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anaerobic gut pathogen, Clostridioides difficile, forms adherent biofilms that may play an important role in recurrent C. difficile infections. The mechanisms underlying C. difficile community formation and inter-bacterial interactions are nevertheless poorly understood. C. difficile produces AI-2, a quorum sensing molecule that modulates biofilm formation across many bacterial species. We found that a strain defective in LuxS, the enzyme that mediates AI-2 production, is defective in biofilm development in vitro. Transcriptomic analyses of biofilms formed by wild type (WT) and luxS mutant (luxS) strains revealed a downregulation of prophage loci in the luxS mutant biofilms compared to the WT. Detection of phages and eDNA within biofilms may suggest that DNA release by phage-mediated cell lysis contributes to C. difficile biofilm formation. In order to understand if LuxS mediates C. difficile crosstalk with other gut species, C. difficile interactions with a common gut bacterium, Bacteroides fragilis, were studied. We demonstrate that C. difficile growth is significantly reduced when co-cultured with B. fragilis in mixed biofilms. Interestingly, the absence of C. difficile LuxS alleviates the B. fragilis-mediated growth inhibition. Dual species RNA-sequencing analyses from single and mixed biofilms revealed differential modulation of distinct metabolic pathways for C. difficile WT, luxS and B. fragilis upon co-culture, indicating that AI-2 may be involved in induction of selective metabolic responses in B. fragilis. Overall, our data suggest that C. difficile LuxS/AI-2 utilises different mechanisms to mediate formation of single and mixed species communities.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialQuorum SensingBacterial ProteinsBacteroides fragilisBiofilmsCarbon-Sulfur LyasesClostridioides difficileHomoserineLactonesMutationSignal TransductionBacterial ProteinsCarbon-Sulfur LyasesHomoserineLactonesLuxS protein, BacteriaN-octanoylhomoserine lactone

Identifiers

PMID31289293
PMCPMC6616478
OpenAlexW2961485256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.