Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289281›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

The safety and preventive effects of a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator in Japanese migraine patients.

Daisuke Danno, Miho Iigaya, Noboru Imai, Hisaka Igarashi, Takao Takeshima

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  10. Neuromodulation for Chronic Daily Headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Long-Term Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Ocular Pain.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daisuke DannoDepartment of Neurology, Headache Center, Tominaga Hospital, 1-4-48 Minatomachi Naniwa-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 556-0017, Japan. daisukedanno@yahoo.co.jp.
Miho IigayaDepartment of Neurology, Kitasato University, Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-2916
Noboru ImaiDepartment of Neurology, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, 8-2 Ohtemachi, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka, 420-0853, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8745-0391
Hisaka IgarashiHeadache Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Fujitsu Clinic, 4-1-1 Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8588, Japan.
Takao TakeshimaDepartment of Neurology, Headache Center, Tominaga Hospital, 1-4-48 Minatomachi Naniwa-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 556-0017, Japan.
Fujitsu (Japan) · JPHyogo Medical University · JPKitasato Institute Hospital · JPShizuoka Red Cross Hospital · JPTominaga hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefaly (Cefaly Technology, Seraing, Belgium) is a device that stimulates the bilateral supraorbital nerve transcutaneously. A previous study in Europe proved that Cefaly was an effective and safe device as a preventive therapy for migraine. However, there have been no studies on this device in Asia. We examined the safety and preventive effect of Cefaly for migraine. One-hundred patients were prospectively collected from four headache units in Japan. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 18-75 years of age, migraine with and without aura, and at least 2 attacks per month. A 4-week baseline period was followed by 12-week treatment period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the number of migraine days at 12 weeks. The secondary end points include the changes of the number of migraine attacks, all headache days, acute medicine consumption days and headache severity. After treatment, a questionnaire survey on the satisfaction of the treatment was administered to the patients. The Friedmann test was used to assess the changes between baseline period and after treatment, and Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of efficacy between chronic migraine and episodic migraine, with and without prophylactic treatment or medication overuse. After 12 weeks of treatment, Cefaly use significantly decreased the number of migraine days (8.16 vs. 6.84; p = 0.0036). Only three subjects (3.0%) dropped out due to the adverse effects; however, no serious adverse events were observed. The compliance of this study was very high at 90.0%. Furthermore, a significant decrease was observed in the number of migraine attacks (5.33 vs. 3.94; p = 0.0002) and the intake of acute antimigraine drugs (8.75 vs. 7.83; p = 0.0166). Cefaly is considered to be a safe and highly tolerable effective device for Japanese patients. Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered to UMIN-CTR(UMIN000033333) on 10 July 2018.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPain ManagementPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31289281
PMCPMC6617446
OpenAlexW2961287808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.