Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289271›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A systematic approach to orient the human protein-protein interaction network.

Dana Silverbush, Roded Sharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Need for a Systems Biology Approach in Cancer Explained.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. D'or: deep orienter of protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computational Construction of Toxicant Signaling Networks.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using a Network-Based Analysis Approach to Investigate the Involvement ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dana SilverbushThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel.
Roded SharanThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel. roded@tau.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of an organism serves as a skeleton for its signaling circuitry, which mediates cellular response to environmental and genetic cues. Understanding this circuitry could improve the prediction of gene function and cellular behavior in response to diverse signals. To realize this potential, one has to comprehensively map PPIs and their directions of signal flow. While the quality and the volume of identified human PPIs improved dramatically over the last decade, the directions of these interactions are still mostly unknown, thus precluding subsequent prediction and modeling efforts. Here we present a systematic approach to orient the human PPI network using drug response and cancer genomic data. We provide a diffusion-based method for the orientation task that significantly outperforms existing methods. The oriented network leads to improved prioritization of cancer driver genes and drug targets compared to the state-of-the-art unoriented network.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyData AnalysisDatabases, GeneticDatabases, PharmaceuticalDatasets as TopicHumansNeoplasmsProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31289271
PMCPMC6617457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.