Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289235›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

How lovebirds maneuver through lateral gusts with minimal visual information.

Daniel Quinn, Daniel Kress, Eric Chang, Andrea Stein, Michal Wegrzynski, David Lentink

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A wind-tunnel gust generator for soaring birds and small UAVs.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Turbulence explains the accelerations of an eagle in natural flight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Sensory gaze stabilization in echolocating bats.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. How lovebirds maneuver through lateral gusts with minimal visual information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel QuinnMechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; danquinn@virginia.edu dlentink@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-5221
Daniel KressMechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Eric ChangMechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Andrea SteinMechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Michal WegrzynskiMechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
David LentinkMechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; danquinn@virginia.edu dlentink@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flying birds maneuver effectively through lateral gusts, even when gust speeds are as high as flight speeds. What information birds use to sense gusts and how they compensate is largely unknown. We found that lovebirds can maneuver through 45° lateral gusts similarly well in forest-, lake-, and cave-like visual environments. Despite being diurnal and raised in captivity, the birds fly to their goal perch with only a dim point light source as a beacon, showing that they do not need optic flow or a visual horizon to maneuver. To accomplish this feat, lovebirds primarily yaw their bodies into the gust while fixating their head on the goal using neck angles of up to 30°. Our corroborated model for proportional yaw reorientation and speed control shows how lovebirds can compensate for lateral gusts informed by muscle proprioceptive cues from neck twist. The neck muscles not only stabilize the lovebirds' visual and inertial head orientations by compensating low-frequency body maneuvers, but also attenuate faster 3D wingbeat-induced perturbations. This head stabilization enables the vestibular system to sense the direction of gravity. Apparently, the visual horizon can be replaced by a gravitational horizon to inform the observed horizontal gust compensation maneuvers in the dark. Our scaling analysis shows how this minimal sensorimotor solution scales favorably for bigger birds, offering local wind angle feedback within a wingbeat. The way lovebirds glean wind orientation may thus inform minimal control algorithms that enable aerial robots to maneuver in similar windy and dark environments.

Indexed as

AgapornisAnimalsDarknessFeedback, SensoryFemaleFlight, AnimalMaleNeck MusclesOrientationPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionWindWings, Animalbirdcontrolflightgustvisual

Identifiers

PMID31289235
PMCPMC6660782
OpenAlexW2958125739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.