Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289088›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Role of

Wieke W Kremer, Johannes Berkhof, Maaike Cg Bleeker, Daniëlle Am Heideman, Nienke E van Trommel, Marchien W van Baal, Harold R Verhoeve, Chris Jlm Meijer, Gemma G Kenter

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FAM19A4/miR124-2 Methylation Testing and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 Genotyping in HPV-Positive Women Under the Age of 30 Years.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Clinical Regression of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Is Associated With Absence ofJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wieke W KremerPathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-1505
Johannes BerkhofEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maaike Cg BleekerPathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniëlle Am HeidemanPathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nienke E van TrommelCentre for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marchien W van BaalObstetrics and Gynaecology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
Harold R VerhoeveObstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris Jlm MeijerPathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gemma G KenterObstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe clinical course of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) is characterised by a high spontaneous regression rate. Histological assessment is unable to differentiate between CIN2/3 lesions likely to regress and those likely to persist or progress. Most CIN2/3 lesions are treated by surgical excision, leading to overtreatment of a substantial proportion. In this prospective study, we evaluate the value of DNA methylation of host cell genes, which has shown to be particularly sensitive for the detection of advanced CIN2/3 and cervical cancer, in the prediction of regression or non-regression of CIN2/3 lesions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre observational longitudinal study with 24-month follow-up. Women referred for colposcopy with an abnormal cervical scrape, who have been diagnosed with CIN2/3 and a small cervical lesion (≤50% of cervix) will be asked to participate. Participants will be monitored by 6-monthly cytological and colposcopic examination. In case of clinical progression, participants will receive treatment and exit the study protocol. At baseline and during follow-up, self-sampled cervicovaginal brushes and cervical scrapes will be collected for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained in all participating clinics. Results of the main study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6069; Pre-results.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBiopsyColposcopyCytokinesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMicroRNAsNeoplasm Regression, SpontaneousPapillomavirus InfectionsPrognosisUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCytokinesMicroRNAsMIRN124-2 microRNA, humanTAFA4 protein, humancervical intraepithelial neoplasiacolposcopyDNA methylationhuman papillomavirusnatural historyovertreatment

Identifiers

PMID31289088
PMCPMC6629415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.