Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289087›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

How is poststroke fatigue understood by stroke survivors and carers? A thematic analysis of an online discussion forum.

Karen Thomas, Chloe Gamlin, Anna De Simoni, Ricky Mullis, Jonathan Mant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What Is Shared in an Online Peer-Support Group Run by Stroke Survivors? An Exploratory Study With a Participatory Approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Carers' experiences and perspectives of the use of anticholinergic medications in people living with dementia: Analysis of an online discussion forum.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen ThomasDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-0862
Chloe GamlinDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anna De SimoniCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ricky MullisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan MantDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand poststroke fatigue from the perspective of stroke survivors and caregivers expressed in an online discussion forum.

designThe search terms 'tiredness', 'fatigue', 'tired', 'weary' and 'weariness' were used to identify relevant posts. Thematic analysis performed by two independent researchers who coded all forum posts and identified pertinent themes. Posts were coded in relation to two research questions: (1) how is poststroke fatigue described? and (2) what coping strategies are suggested to target poststroke fatigue? Each theme was then summarised by a lead quotation in forum users' own words.

settingUK-based web forum hosted by Stroke Association, TalkStroke. Archives from 2004 to 2011 were accessed.

participants65 stroke survivors and caregivers (mean age 54 years, 61% female) contributed to 89 relevant posts that included a relevant search term. This included 38 stroke survivors, 23 individuals with family or carer role and 4 others unidentified.

resultsSix themes were generated: (1) medicalisation of poststroke fatigue: 'a classic poststroke symptom', (2) a tiredness unique to stroke: 'a legacy of stroke', (3) normalisation and acceptance of poststroke fatigue: 'part and parcel of stroke', (4) fighting the fatigue: 'an unwelcome guest', (5) survivors' and caregivers' biological explanations: 'the brain healing' and (6) coping mechanisms: 'pace yourself'. Forum users also repeatedly commented that poststroke fatigue was 'not understood by the profession'.

conclusionThis is the first study to employ data from an online forum to characterise poststroke fatigue. Our data are considered naturalistic owing to the absence of a researcher guiding the discussion and thus generates useful insights for healthcare professionals. Findings suggest a requirement for consistent understanding and explanation to be provided by healthcare professionals. The beliefs outlined here highlight the gap between clinical and community knowledge. Further research to translate understanding of patient and carer perspective into improved management of poststroke fatigue is required.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCaregiversInternetSurvivorsAdaptation, PsychologicalData CollectionFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchStrokechronic illnessfatiguequalitative researchrehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID31289087
PMCPMC6615782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.