Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289060›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

A tailored approach towards informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Lieke M van den Heuvel, Yvonne M Hoedemaekers, Annette F Baas, J Peter van Tintelen, Ellen M A Smets, Imke Christiaans

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Risk stratification and subclinical phenotyping of dilated and/or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy mutation-positive relatives: CVON eDETECT consortium.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lieke M van den HeuvelDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvonne M HoedemaekersDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annette F BaasDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Peter van TintelenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ellen M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Imke ChristiaansDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn current practice, probands are asked to inform relatives about the possibility of predictive DNA testing when a pathogenic variant causing an inherited cardiac condition (ICC) is identified. Previous research on the uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing in relatives suggests that not all relatives are sufficiently informed. We developed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored approach in which probands decide together with the genetic counsellor which relatives they inform themselves and which relatives they prefer to have informed by the genetic counsellor. Here, we present the study protocol of this randomised controlled trial.

methodsA multicentre randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design will be conducted in which an intervention group receiving the tailored approach will be compared with a control group receiving usual care. Adult probands diagnosed with an ICC in whom a likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant is identified will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group (total sample: n=85 probands). Primary outcomes are uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing by relatives (total sample: n=340 relatives). Secondary outcomes are appreciation of the approach used and impact on familial and psychological functioning, which will be assessed using questionnaires. Relatives who attend genetic counselling will be asked to fill out a questionnaire as well. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres (MEC 2017-145), the Netherlands. All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Results of the study on primary and secondary outcome measures will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6657; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingAdultCardiovascular DiseasesDecision MakingFamily RelationsFemaleGenetic CounselingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth SurveysHumansMaleNetherlandsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTruth Disclosurecardiogeneticsfamily-mediated approachinforming relatives at riskinherited cardiac conditionsrandomised controlled trialtailored approach

Identifiers

PMID31289060
PMCPMC6615798
OpenAlexW2959466804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.