Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289057›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Barriers to smoking cessation: a qualitative study from the perspective of primary care in Malaysia.

Kooi-Yau Chean, Lee Gan Goh, Kah-Weng Liew, Chia-Chia Tan, Xin-Ling Choi, Kean-Chye Tan, Siew-Ting Ooi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Temporal Analysis and Spatial Distribution of Mortality Related to Head and Neck Cancer in the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kooi-Yau CheanDepartment of Family Medicine, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7225-2133
Lee Gan GohDepartment of Family Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Kah-Weng LiewDepartment of Family Medicine, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus, Penang, Malaysia.
Chia-Chia TanDepartment of Family Medicine, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus, Penang, Malaysia.
Xin-Ling ChoiDepartment of Family Medicine, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus, Penang, Malaysia.
Kean-Chye TanDepartment of Family Medicine, RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus, Penang, Malaysia.
Siew-Ting OoiUniversity of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis qualitative study aims to construct a model of the barriers to smoking cessation in the primary care setting.

designIndividual in-depth, semistructured interviews were audio-taped, then verbatim transcribed and translated when necessary. The data were first independently coded and then collectively discussed for emergent themes using the Straussian grounded theory method. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingFifty-seven current smokers were recruited from a previous smoking related study carried out in a primary care setting in Malaysia. Current smokers with at least one failed quit attempts were included.

resultsA five-theme model emerged from this grounded theory method. (1) Personal and lifestyle factors: participants were unable to resist the temptation to smoke; (2) Nicotine addiction: withdrawal symptoms could not be overcome; (3) Social cultural norms: participants identified accepting cigarettes from friends as a token of friendship to be problematic; (4) Misconception: perception among smokers that ability to quit was solely based on one's ability to achieve mind control, and perception that stopping smoking will harm the body and (5) Failed assisted smoking cessation: smoking cessation services were not felt to be user-friendly and were poorly understood. The themes were organised into five concentric circles based on time frame: those actionable in the short term (themes 1 and 2) and the long term (themes 3, 4, 5).

conclusionsFive themes of specific beliefs and practices prevented smokers from quitting. Clinicians need to work on these barriers, which can be guided by the recommended time frames to help patients to succeed in smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSmoking CessationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPeer Groupbarriersgrounded theorymalaysiaprimary carequalitative studysmoking cessation strategies

Identifiers

PMID31289057
PMCPMC6629417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.