Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288859›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Leveraging policy to reduce chronic opioid use by educating and empowering community dwelling adults: a study protocol for the TAPERING randomized controlled trial.

Justin P Turner, Patricia Caetano, Cara Tannenbaum

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03400384 (Using Policy to Reduce Opioids by Educating and Empowering Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03400384 nacompletednot on this map

Using Policy to Reduce Opioids by Educating and Empowering Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain: The TAPERING Randomised Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de MontrealRan2018 to 2019Enrolled4,255ConditionsInappropriate Dose of Drug Administered, Pain, Chronic, Health BehaviorArmsDirect-to-consumer educational brochure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin P TurnerFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. justin.turner@criugm.qc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-108X
Patricia CaetanoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Cara TannenbaumCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 201410PHE-PHE- 337814-96399Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 2016/2017-33087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use has risen to epidemic proportions across Canada, with increasing evidence of harms including accidental overdose and death. Policy-makers have called for effective approaches to promote opioid reduction. One promising method from deprescribing randomized trials is to empower patients through direct-to-patient education. The current trial will evaluate the effectiveness of a government-led mail-out of educational information to adult community-dwelling, chronic opioid users on the reduction of opioids compared to usual care.

methodsThis is a pragmatic, prospective, cluster randomized, parallel-arm controlled trial, comparing mailed distribution of a direct-to-patient educational brochure for chronic opioid use (intervention arm) to usual care (control arm). Eligible participants from across Manitoba, Canada, will be identified by the Provincial Drug Programs Branch within the Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living Department of the Manitoba Government, allocated to primary care providers, and the latter will be randomized in clusters of family medicine practices to achieve a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is complete cessation of opioids after 6 months assessed using Drug Program Information Network data. Secondary outcomes include ≥ 25% dose reduction in the mean morphine milligram equivalent (MME) daily dose, reduction of daily dose to < 90 mg MME, or therapeutic switch to another opioid or non-opioid medication. Data will be analyzed using intent-to-treat generalized estimating equations. DISCUSSION: This trial will test the efficacy of a population-based, wide-scale, government-led direct-to-patient educational initiative to drive reductions in chronic opioid use by community-dwelling adults across Manitoba.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03400384 . Registered on 18 January 2018.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsDrug SubstitutionPamphletsAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainDrug Administration ScheduleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHumansManitobaOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Education as TopicPolicy MakingPostal ServicePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidAnalgesicsChronic painDeprescribingGovernmentOpioidsPatient educationPolicy

Identifiers

PMID31288859
PMCPMC6617933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.