ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019
Development of a pilot rare disease registry: a focus group study of initial steps towards the establishment of a rare disease ecosystem in Slovenia.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Minimum Data Set for Rare Diseases: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of health condition and outcome registry systems: a systematic literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Pooled it
- Gene therapy of rare diseases as a milestone in medicine - overview of the field and report on initial experiences in Slovenia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Design, development and evaluation of registry software for upper limb disabilities.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
- Scoping review of the recommendations and guidance for improving the quality of rare disease registries.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Needs and Experiences With Health Care Providers of Adult Rare Disease Patients and Caregivers of People With Rare Diseases: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Current state of rare disease registries and databases in Australia: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Development and pilot implementation of Iranian Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Registry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators for disease registry systems: a mixed-method study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Towards a Comprehensive Strategy for the Management of Rare Diseases in Slovenia: Outlining an IT-Enabled Ecosystemic Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Italian National Registry for FSHD: an enhanced data integration and an analytics framework towards Smart Health Care and Precision Medicine for a rare disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- The de novo FAIRification process of a registry for vascular anomalies.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Lessons learned from hemolytic uremic syndrome registries: recommendations for implementation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Patient and family experience with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) and polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN) amyloidosis: results of two focus groups.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Learning from disease registries during a pandemic: Moving toward an international federation of patient registries.Clinics in dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccording to rough estimates, there are approximately 150,000 rare disease patients in Slovenia (out of a total population of 2 million). Despite the absence of accurate epidemiological data on their status, these figures reveal the great importance of this area for the Slovenian healthcare system. Consistent monitoring in the field of rare diseases facilitates evidence-informed healthcare policies, comprehensive observation of rare disease patients, and consequently serves increasingly demanding medical and statistical needs. This paper initially explores the current situation concerning rare diseases and identifies related challenges for the planned development of a national rare disease registry in Slovenia. Based on the research findings, the paper outlines the construction of the pilot rare disease registry and conceptualizes the establishment of a rare disease ecosystem in Slovenia.
methodsThe research is based on a case study design, where focus group sessions were used as the main data collection technique. Structured discussions were conducted with 24 eminent experts affiliated with the leading institutions in the field of rare diseases in Slovenia. Analysis and interpretations of the data obtained were carried by means of conventional content analysis. A subsequent course of action for developing the pilot rare disease registry and conceptualizing the rare disease ecosystem was formulated in collaboration with the experts participating in the focus groups.
resultsThe research results indicate that the effective development of the national rare disease registry, followed by the establishment of the rare disease ecosystem in Slovenia, requires a broad approach that entails a whole series of systemic changes and considerations. Moreover, well-orchestrated and well-funded efforts to achieve this goal should involve the coordinated action of all stakeholders, including the amendment of the regulatory framework, quality design, and enactment of a general rare disease policy, as well as the alignment of medical, organizational, and technological aspects in accordance with the long-term public healthcare objectives.
conclusionsThe establishment of a rare disease ecosystem in Slovenia and probably elsewhere, including a national rare disease registry, would represent an important improvement for patients, as it could significantly contribute to more coordinated healthcare treatment and enable comprehensive monitoring of the treatment process and results. A well-organized rare disease ecosystem could bring considerable benefits to healthcare system managers by providing a useful platform for estimating the required resources, evidence-informed policymaking, technological innovation, and organizational restructuring. This research provides valuable insight into the background of the issues that many countries face in the field of rare diseases, and ultimately provides practical recommendations for the development of national rare disease registries. However, ensuring effective healthcare delivery in this intricate field is critically dependent on the harmonization of digital solutions with other systemic factors and the adaptation of the rare disease ecosystem to the patients' needs and the specifics of the healthcare environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.