Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288816›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

How do hospital-based nurses and physicians identify the palliative phase in their patients and what difficulties exist? A qualitative interview study.

Isabelle Flierman, Ineke C Nugteren, Rosanne van Seben, Bianca M Buurman, Dick L Willems

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabelle FliermanDepartment of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Univeristy of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.flierman@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-8417
Ineke C NugterenDepartment of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Univeristy of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rosanne van SebenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bianca M BuurmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick L WillemsDepartment of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Univeristy of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 844001103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly start of palliative care improves the quality of life of eligible patients and their relatives. However, in hospital, patients who could benefit from palliative care are often not identified timely. The aim of this study is to assess how hospital-based nurses and physicians define the palliative phase, how they identify the palliative phase and what difficulties they face.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were held with ten nurses and 18 physicians working at seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsNurses and physicians feel insecure about how to define the palliative phase and differentiate between an acute and extended phase. Great variation existed in what life expectancy is attributed to each phase. A variety of ways to identify the palliative phase were described: 1) Prognostication. 2) Treatment trade-off. 3) Assessment of patients' preferences and needs. 4) Interprofessional collaboration. Professionals base prognostication on their experience but also search for clinical indicators. When benefits of treatment no longer outweigh the negatives, this was considered an, albeit late, identification point. To start a conversation on a patients' palliative care needs was found to be difficult. Therefore, some respondents wait for patients to vocalize preferences themselves. Many professionals rely on interprofessional collaboration for identification, however uncertainty exist about responsibilities. Difficulties in identification occurred because of variance in definitions, unpredictability of non-oncological diseases, focus on treatment and difficulties in communication and collaboration.

conclusionThese results provide insight into the challenges and difficulties hospital-based professionals experience in timely identification of patients with palliative care needs.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNursing Staff, HospitalPalliative CarePhysiciansQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeHospitalsIdentificationNursesPalliative carePhysicians

Identifiers

PMID31288816
PMCPMC6617645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.