Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288710›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

To see or not to see: molecular evolution of the rhodopsin visual pigment in neotropical electric fishes.

Alexander Van Nynatten, Francesco H Janzen, Kristen Brochu, Javier A Maldonado-Ocampo, William G R Crampton, Belinda S W Chang, Nathan R Lovejoy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander Van Nynatten1 Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada M5S 3G5.
Francesco H Janzen3 Department of Biology, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario , Canada K1N 6N5.
Kristen Brochu5 Department of Entomology, Penn State University , University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 USA.
Javier A Maldonado-Ocampo6 Laboratorio de Ictiología, Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática-UNESIS, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana , Bogotá , Colombia.
William G R Crampton7 Department of Biology, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816 , USA.
Belinda S W Chang1 Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada M5S 3G5.
Nathan R Lovejoy1 Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada M5S 3G5.
University of Toronto · CAPennsylvania State University · USPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional variation in rhodopsin, the dim-light-specialized visual pigment, frequently occurs in species inhabiting light-limited environments. Variation in visual function can arise through two processes: relaxation of selection or adaptive evolution improving photon detection in a given environment. Here, we investigate the molecular evolution of rhodopsin in Gymnotiformes, an order of mostly nocturnal South American fishes that evolved sophisticated electrosensory capabilities. Our initial sequencing revealed a mutation associated with visual disease in humans. As these fishes are thought to have poor vision, this would be consistent with a possible sensory trade-off between the visual system and a novel electrosensory system. To investigate this, we surveyed rhodopsin from 147 gymnotiform species, spanning the order, and analysed patterns of molecular evolution. In contrast with our expectation, we detected strong selective constraint in gymnotiform rhodopsin, with rates of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions lower in gymnotiforms than in other vertebrate lineages. In addition, we found evidence for positive selection on the branch leading to gymnotiforms and on a branch leading to a clade of deep-channel specialized gymnotiform species. We also found evidence that deleterious effects of a human disease-associated substitution are likely to be masked by epistatic substitutions at nearby sites. Our results suggest that rhodopsin remains an important component of the gymnotiform sensory system alongside electrolocation, and that photosensitivity of rhodopsin is well adapted for vision in dim-light environments.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsEcosystemFishesLightPhylogenyRhodopsinVision, OcularRhodopsinclade models of molecular evolutionevolution of fish visionGymnotiformeslikelihood-based codon modelspositive selectionrhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID31288710
PMCPMC6650718
OpenAlexW2958004592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.