Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288706›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2019

On the diverse and opposing effects of nutrition on pathogen virulence.

Victoria L Pike, Katrina A Lythgoe, Kayla C King

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria L Pike1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3SZ , UK.
Katrina A Lythgoe2 Big Data Institute, University of Oxford , Oxford OX3 ZLF , UK.
Kayla C King1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3SZ , UK.
University of Oxford · GBOpen Data Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011224/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107652/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and anthropogenic activity are currently driving large changes in nutritional availability across ecosystems, with consequences for infectious disease. An increase in host nutrition could lead to more resources for hosts to expend on the immune system or for pathogens to exploit. In this paper, we report a meta-analysis of studies on host-pathogen systems across the tree of life, to examine the impact of host nutritional quality and quantity on pathogen virulence. We did not find broad support across studies for a one-way effect of nutrient availability on pathogen virulence. We thus discuss a hypothesis that there is a balance between the effect of host nutrition on the immune system and on pathogen resources, with the pivot point of the balance differing for vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Our results suggest that variation in nutrition, caused by natural or anthropogenic factors, can have diverse effects on infectious disease outcomes across species.

Indexed as

VirulenceAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansNutritional StatusPlant DiseasesPlantsenvironmental variationhost–pathogen interactionsimmune systemnutritionresourcesvirulence

Identifiers

PMID31288706
PMCPMC6650706
OpenAlexW2959463585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.