Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288700›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Heightened condition-dependence of the sexual transcriptome as a function of genetic quality in Drosophila melanogaster head tissue.

Antonino Malacrinò, Christopher M Kimber, Martin Brengdahl, Urban Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ageing desexualizes theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonino Malacrinò1 IFM Biology, AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group, Linköping University , 581 83 Linköping , Sweden.
Christopher M Kimber1 IFM Biology, AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group, Linköping University , 581 83 Linköping , Sweden.
Martin Brengdahl1 IFM Biology, AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group, Linköping University , 581 83 Linköping , Sweden.
Urban Friberg1 IFM Biology, AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group, Linköping University , 581 83 Linköping , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory suggests sexual traits should show heightened condition-dependent expression. This prediction has been tested extensively in experiments where condition has been manipulated through environmental quality. Condition-dependence as a function of genetic quality has, however, only rarely been addressed, despite its central importance in evolutionary theory. To address the effect of genetic quality on expression of sexual and non-sexual traits, we here compare gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster head tissue between flies with intact genomes (high condition) and flies carrying a major deleterious mutation (low condition). We find that sex-biased genes show heightened condition-dependent expression in both sexes, and that expression in low condition males and females regresses towards a more similar expression profile. As predicted, sex-biased expression was more sensitive to condition in males compared to females, but surprisingly female-biased, rather than male-biased, genes show higher sensitivity to condition in both sexes. Our results thus support the fundamental predictions of the theory of condition-dependence when condition is a function of genetic quality.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSex CharacteristicsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHeadMaleSequence Analysis, RNASequence DeletionTranscriptomecondition-dependenceDrosophila melanogastergene expressiongenetic qualitysexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID31288700
PMCPMC6650720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.