Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288687›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

Tidal drift removes the need for area-restricted search in foraging Atlantic puffins.

Ashley Bennison, John L Quinn, Alison Debney, Mark Jessopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A guide to area-restricted search: a foundational foraging behaviour.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley Bennison1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland.
John L Quinn1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland.
Alison Debney3 Zoological Society of London , Regents Park, London , UK.
Mark Jessopp1 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how animals forage is a central objective in ecology. Theory suggests that where food is uniformly distributed, Brownian movement ensures the maximum prey encounter rate, but when prey is patchy, the optimal strategy resembles a Lévy walk where area-restricted search (ARS) is interspersed with commuting between prey patches. Such movement appears ubiquitous in high trophic-level marine predators. Here, we report foraging and diving behaviour in a seabird with a high cost of flight, the Atlantic puffin ( Fratercula arctica), and report a clear lack of Brownian or Levy flight and associated ARS. Instead, puffins foraged using tides to transport them through their feeding grounds. Energetic models suggest the cost of foraging trips using the drift strategy is 28-46% less than flying between patches. We suggest such alternative movement strategies are habitat-specific, but likely to be far more widespread than currently thought.

Indexed as

CharadriiformesDivingAnimalsEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFoodarea-restricted searchenergeticsforagingmovement ecology

Identifiers

PMID31288687
PMCPMC6684983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.