Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288621›Full record

ReviewThe veterinary quarterly2019

Technological interventions and advances in the diagnosis of intramammary infections in animals with emphasis on bovine population-a review.

Sandip Chakraborty, Kuldeep Dhama, Ruchi Tiwari, Mohd Iqbal Yatoo, Sandip Kumar Khurana, Rekha Khandia, Ashok Munjal, Palanivelu Munuswamy, M Asok Kumar, Mithilesh Singh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The veterinary quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandip ChakrabortyDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Sciences & Animal Husbandry , West Tripura , India.
Kuldeep DhamaDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7469-4752
Ruchi TiwariDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalay Evum Go-Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU) , Mathura , India.
Mohd Iqbal YatooSher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir , Srinagar , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-7354
Sandip Kumar KhuranaCentral Institute for Research on Buffaloes , Hisar , India.
Rekha KhandiaDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah University , Bhopal , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-3127
Ashok MunjalDepartment of Biochemistry and Genetics, Barkatullah University , Bhopal , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6294-1584
Palanivelu MunuswamyDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly , India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1221-5231
M Asok KumarDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly , India.
Mithilesh SinghImmunology Section, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly , India.
Rajendra SinghDivision of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly , India.
Vivek Kumar GuptaCentre for Animal Disease Research and Diagnosis, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute , Bareilly , India.
Wanpen ChaicumpaCenter of Research Excellence on Therapeutic Proteins and Antibody Engineering, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok , Thailand.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INBarkatullah University · INCentral Institute for Research on Buffaloes · INSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INSiriraj Hospital · THUttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go-Anusandhan Sansthan · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis, an inflammation of the udder, is a challenging problem in dairy animals accounting for high economic losses. Disease complexity, degree of economic losses and increasing importance of the dairy industries along with public health concerns envisages devising appropriate diagnostics of mastitis, which can offer rapid, accurate and confirmatory diagnosis. The various diagnostic tests of mastitis have been divided into general or phenotypic and specific or genotypic tests. General or phenotypic tests are those that identify general alterations, which are not specific to any pathogen. Genotypic tests are specific, hence confirmatory for diagnosis of mastitis and include specific culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and its various versions (e.g. qRT-PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification, lateral flow assays, nucleotide sequencing, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and other molecular diagnostic methods. However, for highly specific and confirmatory diagnosis, pure cultures still provide raw materials for more sophisticated diagnostic technological interventions like PCR and nucleotide sequencing. Diagnostic ability of like infra-red thermography (IRT) has been shown to be similar to California mastitis test and also differentiates clinical mastitis from subclinical mastitis cases. As such, IRT can become a convenient and portable diagnostic tool. Of note, magnetic nanoparticles-based colorimetric biosensor assay was developed by using for instance proteolytic activity of plasmin or anti-

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCattleClinical Laboratory TechniquesDairyingFemaleGenotypeMastitis, BovinePolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkersBovinecowdiagnosismastitisreview

Identifiers

PMID31288621
PMCPMC6830988
OpenAlexW2959570483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.