Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31288616›Full record

SynthesisTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2019

A Systematic Review and Guide to Mechanical Testing for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Jay M Patel, Brian C Wise, Edward D Bonnevie, Robert L Mauck

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. TNFα-Related Chondrocyte Inflammation Models: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Material-Assisted Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dose-Dependent, Biomechanical Recovery of Permeability Ex Vivo in GAG-Depleted Cartilage With a Synthetic Polyelectrolyte, Polystyrene Sulfonate.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Graphene and TiACS applied bio materials · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jay M PatelMcKay Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian C WiseMcKay Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Edward D BonnevieMcKay Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert L MauckMcKay Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
Evaluation of Cartilage Tissue Engineering Strategies by IR ImagingR01AR056145 · NIAMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI PLESHKO, NANCY · 2009 to 2020
$3.3M
Engineering Developmental Microenvironments: Cartilage Formation and MaturationR01EB008722 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BURDICK, JASON A, MAUCK, ROBERT L · 2009 to 2017
$3.0M
Tunable Mechano-Activated Microcapsules for Therapeutic DeliveryR01AR071340 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DODGE, GEORGE R., LEE, DAEYEON · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Altered Mechanical Signaling in the Annulus Fibrosus in Intervertebral Disc DegenerationF32AR072478 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BONNEVIE, EDWARD D · 2018 to 2019
$120k
NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR072478NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056145NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR071340NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008722RRD VA I01 RX000700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Articular cartilage is integral to the mechanical function of many joints in the body. When injured, cartilage lacks the capacity to self-heal, and thus, therapies and replacements have been developed in recent decades to treat damaged cartilage. Given that the primary function of articular cartilage is mechanical in nature, rigorous physical evaluation of cartilage tissues undergoing treatment and cartilage constructs intended for replacement is an absolute necessity. With the large number of groups developing cartilage tissue engineering strategies, however, a variety of mechanical testing protocols have been reported in the literature. This lack of consensus in testing methods makes comparison between studies difficult at times, and can lead to misinterpretation of data relative to native tissue. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to systematically review mechanical testing of articular cartilage and cartilage repair constructs over the past 10 years (January 2009-December 2018), to highlight the most common testing configurations, and to identify key testing parameters. For the most common tests, key parameters identified in this systematic review were validated by characterizing both cartilage tissue and hydrogels commonly used in cartilage tissue engineering. Our findings show that compression testing was the most common test performed (80.2%; 158/197), followed by evaluation of frictional properties (18.8%; 37/197). Upon further review of those studies performing compression testing, the various modes (ramp, stress relaxation, creep, dynamic) and testing configurations (unconfined, confined,

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCartilage, ArticularCompressive StrengthHumansLubricationMaterials TestingReference StandardsStress, Mechanicalbiomechanicscartilagecompressionmechanical testingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31288616
PMCPMC6791482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.