ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
A Systematic Review of the Clinical Value and Applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Renal Surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching and evolution in surgical planning of robotic partial nephrectomy with 3D printing models.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Polymers in Physics, Chemistry and Biology: Behavior of Linear Polymers in Fractal Structures.Polymers · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular computed tomography in cardiovascular disease: An overview of its applications from diagnosis to prediction.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in 3D printing physical organ models.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- [Intervention planning in modern renal surgery].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Promising New Horizons in Medicine: Medical Advancements with Nanocomposite Manufacturing via 3D Printing.Polymers · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Customized Imaging Reconstruction for Urological Surgery: Diffusion and Role in Real-Life Practice from an International Survey.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Technologic advances in robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Application of 3D-printed osteotomy guide plates in proximal femoral osteotomy for DDH in children: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Low-Cost Models in Medical Education and Clinical Practice.Micromachines · 2023Review
- 3D Printed Models in Cardiovascular Disease: An Exciting Future to Deliver Personalized Medicine.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Standardizing evaluation of patient-specific 3D printed models in surgical planning: development of a cross-disciplinary survey tool for physician and trainee feedback.BMC medical education · 2022Review
- A systematic review of the clinical value and applications of three-dimensional virtual reconstructions in renal tumors.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2022Review
- A study of three-dimensional reconstruction and printing models in two cases of soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- 3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- Multispecialty Enterprise Imaging Workgroup Consensus on Interactive Multimedia Reporting Current State and Road to the Future: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.Journal of digital imaging · 2021Review
- Development of a 3D-printed testicular cancer model for testicular examination education.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- The Role of 3D-Printed Phantoms and Devices for Organ-specified Appliances in Urology.International journal of bioprinting · 2021Review
- Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific 3D Printed Models in Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Directions.Biomolecules · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review is to collate and analyse the current literature which examines clinical applications of 3D printing for renal disease, alongside cost and time duration factors associated with the printing process. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed across five different databases to identify studies that qualitatively and quantitatively assessed the value of 3D-printed kidney models for renal disease. Twenty-seven studies met the selection criteria for inclusion in the review. Twenty-five were original studies, and two were case reports. Of the 22 studies reporting a qualitative evaluation, the analysis of findings demonstrated the value of the 3D-printed models in areas of clinician and patient education, and pre-surgical simulation for complex cases of renal disease. Of five studies performing a quantitative analysis, the analysis of results displayed a high level of spatial and anatomical accuracy amongst models, with benefits including reducing estimated blood loss and risk of intra-operative complications. Fourteen studies evaluated manufacturing costs and time duration, with costs ranging from USD 1 to 1000 per model, and time duration ranging from 15 min to 9 days. This review shows that the use of customised 3D-printed models is valuable in the education of junior surgeons as well as the enhancement of operative skills for senior surgeons due to a superior visualisation of anatomical networks and pathologic morphology compared to volumetric imaging alone. Furthermore, 3D-printed kidney models may facilitate interdisciplinary communication and decision-making regarding the management of patients undergoing operative treatment for renal disease. It cannot be suggested that a more expensive material constitutes a higher level of user-satisfaction and model accuracy. However, higher costs in the manufacturing of the 3D-printed models reported, on average, a slightly shorter time duration for the 3D-printing process and total manufacturing time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.