Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287859›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2019

Visual temporal integration windows are adult-like in 5- to 7-year-old children.

Julie Freschl, David Melcher, Zsuzsa Kaldy, Erik Blaser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temporal Contour Integration Deficits in Children With Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural event segmentation of continuous experience in human infants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Seeing a Page in a Flipbook: Shorter Visual Temporal Integration Windows in 2-Year-Old Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Windows of Integration Hypothesis Revisited.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie FreschlDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
David MelcherDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Zsuzsa KaldyDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Erik BlaserDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The development of the temporal organization of perception in Autism Spectrum DisorderR21MH117787 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI KALDY, ZSUZSANNA, MELCHER, DAVID P · 2018 to 2019
$419k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH117787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system must organize dynamic input into useful percepts across time, balancing between stability and sensitivity to change. The temporal integration window (TIW) has been hypothesized to underlie this balance: If two or more stimuli fall within the same TIW, they are integrated into a single percept; those that fall in different windows are segmented (Arnett & Di Lollo, 1979; Wutz, Muschter, van Koningsbruggen, Weisz, & Melcher, 2016). Visual TIWs have been studied in adults, showing average windows of 65 ms (Wutz et al., 2016); however, it is unclear how windows develop through early childhood. Here we measured TIWs in 5- to 7-year-old children and adults, using a variant of the missing dot task (Di Lollo, 1980; Wutz et al. 2016), in which integration and segmentation thresholds were measured within the same participant, using the same stimuli. Participants saw a sequence of two displays separated by an interstimulus interval (ISI) that determined the visibility of a visual search target. Longer ISIs increased the likelihood of detecting a segmentation target (but decreased detection for the integration target) although shorter ISIs increased the likelihood of detecting the integration target (but decreased detection of the segmentation target). We could then estimate the TIW by measuring the point at which these two functions intersect. Children's TIWs (M = 68 ms) were comparable to adults' (M = 73 ms) with no appreciable age trend within our sample, indicating that TIWs reach adult levels by approximately 5 years of age.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationReaction TimeTime FactorsTime PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31287859
PMCPMC6892607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.