Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287812›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Novel antibiotics effective against gram-positive and -negative multi-resistant bacteria with limited resistance.

Irène Nicolas, Valérie Bordeau, Arnaud Bondon, Michèle Baudy-Floc'h, Brice Felden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Intracellular activity andJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. New Antibiotics forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanism of action ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irène NicolasUniversity of Rennes, Inserm, BRM [Bacterial Regulatory RNAs and Medicine] UMR_S 1230, Rue du Professeur Léon Bernard, France.
Valérie BordeauUniversity of Rennes, Inserm, BRM [Bacterial Regulatory RNAs and Medicine] UMR_S 1230, Rue du Professeur Léon Bernard, France.
Arnaud BondonUniversity of Rennes, CNRS, ISCR-UMR 6226, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9229-6317
Michèle Baudy-Floc'hUniversity of Rennes, CNRS, ISCR-UMR 6226, France.
Brice FeldenUniversity of Rennes, Inserm, BRM [Bacterial Regulatory RNAs and Medicine] UMR_S 1230, Rue du Professeur Léon Bernard, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2803-0626
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are a medical wonder, but an increasing frequency of resistance among most human pathogens is rendering them ineffective. If this trend continues, the consequences for public health and for the general community could be catastrophic. The current clinical pipeline, however, is very limited and is dominated by derivatives of established classes, the "me too" compounds. Here, we have exploited our recent identification of a bacterial toxin to transform it into antibiotics active on multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-positive and -negative bacterial pathogens. We generated a new family of peptidomimetics-cyclic heptapseudopeptides-inspired from a natural bacterial peptide. Out of the 4 peptides studied, 2 are effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in mild and severe sepsis mouse models without exhibiting toxicity on human erythrocytes and kidney cells, zebrafish embryos, and mice. These new compounds are safe at their active doses and above, without nephrotoxicity. Efficacy was also demonstrated against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and MRSA in a mouse skin infection model. Importantly, these compounds did not result in resistance after serial passages for 2 weeks and 4 or 6 days' exposure in mice. Activity of heptapseudopeptides was explained by the ability of unnatural amino acids to strengthen dynamic association with bacterial lipid bilayers and to induce membrane permeability, leading to bacterial death. Based on structure determination, we showed that cationic domains surrounded by an extended hydrophobic core could improve bactericidal activity. Because 2 peptide analogs, Pep 16 and Pep19, are effective against both MRSA and P. aeruginosa in severe sepsis and skin infection models, respectively, we believe that these peptidomimetics are promising lead candidates for drug development. We have identified potential therapeutic agents that can provide alternative treatments against antimicrobial resistance. Because the compounds are potential leads for therapeutic development, the next step is to start phase I clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPseudomonas aeruginosaSkinStaphylococcal InfectionsZebrafishAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31287812
PMCPMC6615598
OpenAlexW2956579761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.