Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287369›Full record

ReviewJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery2019

Devices for Improved Delivery of Nebulized Pharmaceutical Aerosols to the Lungs.

Worth Longest, Benjamin Spence, Michael Hindle

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Determinants of olfactory cleft targeting in intranasal aerosol delivery: a combined computational and experimental study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Worth LongestDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Benjamin SpenceDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Michael HindleDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

High Efficiency Aerosol Delivery using the Excipient Enhanced Growth Concept: A Human Proof of Concept StudyR01HL107333 · NHLBI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HINDLE, MICHAEL, LONGEST, P. WORTH · 2011 to 2020
$4.2M
High Efficiency Delivery of Surfactant Aerosols to Infants without IntubationR01HL139673 · NHLBI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HINDLE, MICHAEL, LONGEST, P. WORTH · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
High Efficiency Inhalation Delivery of Tobramycin for Children with Cystic FibrosisR01HD087339 · NICHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HINDLE, MICHAEL, LONGEST, P. WORTH · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107333NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139673NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nebulizers have a number of advantages for the delivery of inhaled pharmaceutical aerosols, including the use of aqueous formulations and the ability to deliver process-sensitive proteins, peptides, and biological medications. A frequent disadvantage of nebulized aerosols is poor lung delivery efficiency, which wastes valuable medications, increases delivery times, and may increase side effects of the medication. A focus of previous development efforts and previous nebulizer reviews, has been an improvement of the underlying nebulization technology controlling the breakup of a liquid into droplets. However, for a given nebulization technology, a wide range of secondary devices and strategies can be implemented to significantly improve lung delivery efficiency of the aerosol. This review focuses on secondary devices and technologies that can be implemented to improve the lung delivery efficiency of nebulized aerosols and potentially target the region of drug delivery within the lungs. These secondary devices may (1) modify the aerosol size distribution, (2) synchronize aerosol delivery with inhalation, (3) reduce system depositional losses at connection points, (4) improve the patient interface, or (5) guide patient inhalation. The development of these devices and technologies is also discussed, which often includes the use of computational fluid dynamic simulations, three-dimensional printing and rapid prototype device and airway model construction, realistic

Indexed as

Nebulizers and VaporizersAdministration, InhalationAerosolsDrug Delivery SystemsEquipment DesignHumansLungParticle SizeAerosolsinhalersnebulizerspharmaceutical aerosol devicesrespiratory drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID31287369
PMCPMC6781258
OpenAlexW2957992625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.