ArticleApplied neuropsychology. Adult
Neuropsychological impact of white matter hyperintensities in older adults without dementia.
Article in Applied neuropsychology. Adult. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and ethnic differences in white matter hypointensities: The role of vascular risk factors.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Adding cognition to AT(N) models improves prediction of cognitive and functional decline.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine (a) if simple clinical judgements of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on imaging are associated with measurable cognitive impacts in otherwise cognitively normal older adults, (b) if neuropsychological measures can predict those with WMH, and (c) the frequency of low cognitive scores in those with WMH on a battery of measures. Forty-four individuals judged free of other cognitive disorders despite moderate to extensive WMH were compared with 50 individuals matched on age (mean of 83), education (college educated), and gender (predominantly female). Data was obtained from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database. The group with at least moderate WMH had lower scores on the Trail Making Test A, verbal fluency, and digit span. A component score derived from these measures was a significant predictor of the presence of WMH, though only correctly classified 68% of participants. Even in individuals free from other suspected conditions, clinically judged moderate to extensive WMH was associated with cognitive weaknesses for processing speed, working memory, and executive functioning. This shows that a relatively simple judgment of WMH burden is meaningfully associated with worse cognition. Implications and future directions for are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.