Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287246›Full record

ReviewThoracic cancer2019

Challenges for real-time intraoperative diagnosis of high risk histology in lung adenocarcinoma: A necessity for sublobar resection.

Yusuke Takahashi, Hiroaki Kuroda, Yuko Oya, Noriyuki Matsutani, Hirokazu Matsushita, Masafumi Kawamura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thoracic cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of the feasibility of frozen sections for the detection of spread through air spaces (STAS) in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-4896
Hiroaki KurodaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-9222
Yuko OyaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Noriyuki MatsutaniDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu MatsushitaDivision of Translational Oncoimmunology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Masafumi KawamuraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the incidence of small, peripheral lung adenocarcinoma has been increasing as lung cancer screening with radiologic examination is more widely performed. Tumor size is one of the determinants of the prognostic outcome in clinically node-negative lung adenocarcinoma. Sublobar resection has been proposed as one of the minimally invasive surgical options for small-sized adenocarcinomas. Despite the lack of robust clinical trial evidence, sublobar resection has become more popular, especially in developed countries where less extensive surgery may be of benefit in a population where the age of the elderly is growing. However, high risk histologic features such as micropapillary subtype and tumor spread through air space (STAS) have been associated with a significantly higher risk of local recurrence after sublobar resection, but not after lobectomy. Surgical decision-making based on frozen section diagnosis of high risk histologic features may be useful to prevent local control failure after sublobar resection. At the present time, there is little evidence to demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of identifying high risk histologic features on frozen section. One study has so far demonstrated that diagnostic accuracy of identifying STAS is higher than that of identifying the micropapillary subtype. Additionally, the presence of STAS has been found to be more strongly associated with local recurrence in patients who had undergone sublobar resection. Although further investigation is required for validation of this finding, STAS diagnosis on frozen section may shed further light on intraoperative surgical decision-making during sublobar resection. To this end, we review the recently published data on the intraoperative identification of high risk features.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleRisk FactorsLung adenocarcinomamicropapillaryrecurrencesegmentectomytumor spread through air space

Identifiers

PMID31287246
PMCPMC6669798
OpenAlexW2958134328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.