ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Known-component metal artifact reduction (KC-MAR) for cone-beam CT.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Joint CT reconstruction of anatomy and implants using a mixed prior model.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Automated Digital Image Optimisation in Intraoperative 2D and 3D Imaging Using a Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- Vessel-targeted compensation of deformable motion in interventional cone-beam CT.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Deformable motion compensation in interventional cone-beam CT with a context-aware learned autofocus metric.Medical physics · 2024Article
- A kV-MV approach to CBCT metal artifact reduction using multi-layer MV-CBCT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Reproducibility and location-stability of radiomic features derived from cone-beam computed tomography: a phantom study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Generating missing patient anatomy from partially acquired cone-beam computed tomography images using deep learning: a proof of concept.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Accuracy Assessment of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Metal Artifact Reduction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Deformable 3D-2D registration for high-precision guidance and verification of neuroelectrode placement.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Sinogram + image domain neural network approach for metal artifact reduction in low-dose cone-beam computed tomography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Model-based dual-energy tomographic image reconstruction of objects containing known metal components.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- C-arm orbits for metal artifact avoidance (MAA) in cone-beam CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Cone-beam CT for imaging of the head/brain: Development and assessment of scanner prototype and reconstruction algorithms.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Data-Driven Detection and Registration of Spine Surgery Instrumentation in Intraoperative Images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- Combining dual-tree complex wavelets and multiresolution in iterative CT reconstruction with application to metal artifact reduction.Biomedical engineering online · 2019Article
- Known-component 3D image reconstruction for improved intraoperative imaging in spine surgery: A clinical pilot study.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) is increasingly used for surgical navigation and validation of device placement. In spinal deformity correction, CBCT provides visualization of pedicle screws and fixation rods in relation to adjacent anatomy. This work reports and evaluates a method that uses prior information regarding such surgical instrumentation for improved metal artifact reduction (MAR). The known-component MAR (KC-MAR) approach achieves precise localization of instrumentation in projection images using rigid or deformable 3D-2D registration of component models, thereby overcoming residual errors associated with segmentation-based methods. Projection data containing metal components are processed via 2D inpainting of the detector signal, followed by 3D filtered back-projection (FBP). Phantom studies were performed to identify nominal algorithm parameters and quantitatively investigate performance over a range of component material composition and size. A cadaver study emulating screw and rod placement in spinal deformity correction was conducted to evaluate performance under realistic clinical imaging conditions. KC-MAR demonstrated reduction in artifacts (standard deviation in voxel values) across a range of component types and dose levels, reducing the artifact to 5-10 HU. Accurate component delineation was demonstrated for rigid (screw) and deformable (rod) models with sub-mm registration errors, and a single-pixel dilation of the projected components was found to compensate for partial-volume effects. Artifacts associated with spine screws and rods were reduced by 40%-80% in cadaver studies, and the resulting images demonstrated markedly improved visualization of instrumentation (e.g. screw threads) within cortical margins. The KC-MAR algorithm combines knowledge of surgical instrumentation with 3D image reconstruction in a manner that overcomes potential pitfalls of segmentation. The approach is compatible with FBP-thereby maintaining simplicity in a manner that is consistent with surgical workflow-or more sophisticated model-based reconstruction methods that could further improve image quality and/or help reduce radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.