Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287063›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Identifying Key Target Audiences for Public Health Campaigns: Leveraging Machine Learning in the Case of Hookah Tobacco Smoking.

Kar-Hai Chu, Jason Colditz, Momin Malik, Tabitha Yates, Brian Primack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. AI Horizons in Indian Healthcare: A Vision for Transformation and Equity.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Young Adult Identification and Perception of Hashtag-Based Vaping Claims on Instagram.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kar-Hai Chu *School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2486-8846
Jason Colditz *School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-841X
Momin Malik *Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4871-0429
Tabitha Yates *School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9594-0825
Brian Primack *School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-0939

Funding

Leveraging Twitter to monitor nicotine and tobacco-related cancer communicationR01CA225773 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRIMACK, BRIAN A. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Leveraging mobile applications to maximize tobacco cessationK07CA222338 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHU, KAR-HAI · 2018 to 2021
$585k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHookah tobacco smoking (HTS) is a particularly important issue for public health professionals to address owing to its prevalence and deleterious health effects. Social media sites can be a valuable tool for public health officials to conduct informational health campaigns. Current social media platforms provide researchers with opportunities to better identify and target specific audiences and even individuals. However, we are not aware of systematic research attempting to identify audiences with mixed or ambivalent views toward HTS.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to (1) confirm previous research showing positively skewed HTS sentiment on Twitter using a larger dataset by leveraging machine learning techniques and (2) systematically identify individuals who exhibit mixed opinions about HTS via the Twitter platform and therefore represent key audiences for intervention.

methodsWe prospectively collected tweets related to HTS from January to June 2016. We double-coded sentiment for a subset of approximately 5000 randomly sampled tweets for sentiment toward HTS and used these data to train a machine learning classifier to assess the remaining approximately 556,000 HTS-related Twitter posts. Natural language processing software was used to extract linguistic features (ie, language-based covariates). The data were processed by machine learning tools and algorithms using R. Finally, we used the results to identify individuals who, because they had consistently posted both positive and negative content, might be ambivalent toward HTS and represent an ideal audience for intervention.

resultsThere were 561,960 HTS-related tweets: 373,911 were classified as positive and 183,139 were classified as negative. A set of 12,861 users met a priori criteria indicating that they posted both positive and negative tweets about HTS.

conclusionsSentiment analysis can allow researchers to identify audience segments on social media that demonstrate ambiguity toward key public health issues, such as HTS, and therefore represent ideal populations for intervention. Using large social media datasets can help public health officials to preemptively identify specific audience segments that would be most receptive to targeted campaigns.

Indexed as

Health PromotionHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesPublic HealthSmoking Water PipesSocial Mediainfodemiologyinfoveillancemachine learningpublic healthsmokingsmoking water pipessocial mediatobaccowaterpipe tobacco

Identifiers

PMID31287063
PMCPMC6643764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.