Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287026›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Improving diagnostic performance of the Kato-Katz method for Clonorchis sinensis infection through multiple samples.

Men-Bao Qian, Shi-Feng Zhuang, Shi-Qiao Zhu, Xiao-Mao Deng, Zheng-Xiang Li, Xiao-Nong Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Performance of Mini ParasepParasites & vectors · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Risk Factors forFrontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Men-Bao QianNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Shi-Feng ZhuangHunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, 410005, China.
Shi-Qiao ZhuQiyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qiyang, 426100, China.
Xiao-Mao DengQiyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qiyang, 426100, China.
Zheng-Xiang LiHunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, 410005, China.
Xiao-Nong ZhouNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, 200025, China. zhouxn1@chinacdc.cn.
Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNational Institute for Parasitic Diseases · CN

Funding

National Important Sci-tech Special Projects No. 2008ZX10004-011the Fourth Round of Three-Year Public Health Action Plan (2015-2017) in Shanghai No. GWTD2015S06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClonorchiasis is caused by eating of raw or undercooked freshwater fish containing the larvae of Clonorchis sinensis; the Kato-Katz method is widely applied in diagnosis. The improvement of repeated Kato-Katz smears from multiple stool samples has been well illuminated in many helminths other than C. sinensis.

methodsA cross-sectional investigation was implemented to capture the epidemiology and risk factors of clonorchiasis among middle school students in Qiyang county, China. Students with complete data of six Kato-Katz thick smears from two stool samples were included in this analysis. Data on the habits of eating raw freshwater fish were also collected and compared.

resultsAltogether, 397 students had complete information of six smears, out of which 394 reported the information on eating habits. According to the 'gold' standard by six smears, 77 students (19.4%) were detected with C. sinensis. However, only 45 (11.3%) were detected using a single smear, with an underestimation of 41.6% compared to the 'gold' standard. However, the geometric mean of eggs per gram of feces in detected cases was 126.4 in a single smear, overestimated by 105.2% compared to 61.6 by the 'gold' standard. The linear relationship between prevalence and infection intensity of detected cases based on different smears was significantly negative. The habits of eating raw freshwater fish in the false negative cases was similar to those in the detected cases, but these two groups had significantly higher levels for habits of eating raw freshwater fish than negative individuals.

conclusionsIn low endemicity situations, underestimation of C. sinensis infection could not be avoided based on a limited number of Kato-Katz smears. Thus, repeated smears from at least two stool samples should be considered when an individual eats raw freshwater fish, drug efficacy is evaluated or elimination of C. sinensis is verified. Additionally, when logistics are insufficient for multiple samples to be taken for diagnosis for survey and surveillance in the areas or populations of low endemicity, prevalence accuracy needs to be corrected.

Indexed as

AnimalsChinaClonorchiasisClonorchis sinensisCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFeeding BehaviorFemaleFishesFish ProductsFresh WaterHumansMaleParasite Egg CountPrevalenceSpecimen HandlingClonorchiasisClonorchis sinensisDiagnosisKato-Katz method

Identifiers

PMID31287026
PMCPMC6613260
OpenAlexW2958529406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.