Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31287019›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2019

SMURF-seq: efficient copy number profiling on long-read sequencers.

Rishvanth K Prabakar, Liya Xu, James Hicks, Andrew D Smith

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rishvanth K PrabakarQuantitative and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, 90089, USA.
Liya XuMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, University of Southern California, 1002 Childs Way, Los Angeles, 90089, USA.
James HicksMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, University of Southern California, 1002 Childs Way, Los Angeles, 90089, USA.
Andrew D SmithQuantitative and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, 90089, USA. andrewds@usc.edu.

Funding

Methods to predict molecular complexity in sequencing experimentsR01HG007650 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SMITH, ANDREW DAVID · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007650NIH HHS R01 HG007650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present SMURF-seq, a protocol to efficiently sequence short DNA molecules on a long-read sequencer by randomly ligating them to form long molecules. Applying SMURF-seq using the Oxford Nanopore MinION yields up to 30 fragments per read, providing an average of 6.2 and up to 7.5 million mappable fragments per run, increasing information throughput for read-counting applications. We apply SMURF-seq on the MinION to generate copy number profiles. A comparison with profiles from Illumina sequencing reveals that SMURF-seq attains similar accuracy. More broadly, SMURF-seq expands the utility of long-read sequencers for read-counting applications.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansSequence Analysis, DNACopy number variationLong-read sequencingNanopore sequencingRead-counting applications

Identifiers

PMID31287019
PMCPMC6615205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.