Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286994›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2019

Cross-sectional and longitudinal characterization of SCD patients recruited from the community versus from a memory clinic: subjective cognitive decline, psychoaffective factors, cognitive performances, and atrophy progression over time.

Elizabeth Kuhn, Inès Moulinet, Audrey Perrotin, Renaud La Joie, Brigitte Landeau, Clémence Tomadesso, Alexandre Bejanin, Siya Sherif, Vincent De La Sayette, Béatrice Desgranges and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How "Subjective" is Subjective Cognitive Decline?Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth KuhnInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Inès MoulinetInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Audrey PerrotinInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Renaud La JoieMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brigitte LandeauInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Clémence TomadessoInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Alexandre BejaninInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Siya SherifInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Vincent De La SayetteNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Recherche Universités, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, GIP Cyceron, 14000, Caen, France.
Béatrice DesgrangesNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Recherche Universités, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, GIP Cyceron, 14000, Caen, France.
Denis VivienInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Géraldine PoisnelInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France.
Gaëlle ChételatInserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Université de Caen-Normandie, Boulevard H. Becquerel, 14000, Caen, France. chetelat@cyceron.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-7932

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche LONGVIE 2007Association France Alzheimer et maladies apparentées (FR) AAP 2013Fondation Plan Alzheimer Alzheimer Plan 2008-2012Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (FR) PHRCN 2011-A01493-38 and PHRCN 2012 12-006-0347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubjective cognitive decline (SCD) defines a heterogeneous population, part of which having Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed at characterizing SCD populations according to whether or not they referred to a memory clinic, by assessing the factors associated with increased AD risk.

methodsSeventy-eight cognitively unimpaired older adults from the IMAP+ study (Caen) were included, amongst which 28 healthy controls (HC) and 50 SCD recruited from the community (SCD-community; n = 23) or from a memory clinic (SCD-clinic; n = 27). Participants underwent cognitive, psychoaffective, structural MRI, FDG-PET, and amyloid-PET assessments. They were followed up over a mean period of 2.4 ± 0.8 years. The groups were compared in terms of baseline and follow-up levels of SCD (self- and informant-reported), cognition, subclinical anxiety and depression, and atrophy progression over time. We also investigated SCD substrates within each SCD group through the correlations between self-reported SCD and other psychometric and brain measures.

resultsCompared to HC, both SCD groups showed similar cognitive performances but higher informant-reported SCD and anxiety. Compared to SCD-community, SCD-clinic showed higher informant-reported SCD, depression score, and atrophy progression over time but similar brain amyloid load. A significant increase over time was found for depression in the SCD-community and for self-reported praxis-domestic activities SCD factor in the SCD-clinic. Higher self-reported SCD correlated with (i) lower grey matter volume and higher anxiety in SCD-community, (ii) greater informant-reported SCD in SCD-clinic, and (iii) lower glucose metabolism in both SCD groups.

conclusionsHigher subclinical depression and informant-reported SCD specifically characterize the SCD group that refers to a memory clinic. The same group appears as a frailer population than SCD-community as they show greater atrophy progression over time. Yet, both the SCD groups were quite similar otherwise including for brain amyloid load and the SCD-community showed increased depression score over time. Altogether, our findings highlight the relevance of assessing psychoaffective factors and informant-reported SCD in SCD populations and point to both differences and similarities in SCD populations referring or not to a memory clinic.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationDisease ProgressionGray MatterNeocortexProdromal SymptomsAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAnxietyBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansBiomarkersBiomarkersNeuroimagingPathological ageingPreclinical Alzheimer’s diseasePsychoaffective factorsSubjective cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID31286994
PMCPMC6615169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.