ArticleBMC medical education2019
Impact of video feedback system on medical students' perception of their clinical performance assessment.
Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-directed teaching system driven by video analysis feedback improves surgical skill training for clinical interns: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- The effects of personalized video feedback of basic cardiac life support on knowledge and skills levels in undergraduate nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Virtual suturing skills learning: role of verbal versus written feedback in surgery rotation clerkship.Medical education online · 2022Trial
- An exploratory study on the use of the self-directed learning, self-video recording, peer-to-peer review, and Direct feedback model to enhance clinical skills among medical students in Southern Thailand.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Developing and testing a reflection method for implementation of the informal care guideline in community nursing: Design-based research.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Beyond words: analyzing non-verbal communication techniques in a medical communication skills course via synchronous online platform.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Effects of a sudden change in curriculum delivery mode in postgraduate clinical studies, following the COVID-19 pandemic.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2022Article
- Introducing video content intoScars, burns & healingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProviding feedback on student performance in the clinical performance assessment (CPA) is meaningful in that it helps students understand their strengths and weaknesses. This study compared students' perception of their CPA scores before and after providing personalized video feedback.
methodsTwo identical online surveys of Year 1 medical students (N = 103) that had undergone CPA were conducted to evaluate students' perceptions about their CPA scores before and after video feedback. Students were given their test scores with assessment analysis reports immediately after completing the CPA. Top-scored students from each station agreed to provide their video-recorded performance to the rest of the students.
resultsAfter comparing their performance video and top-scored video at each station, medical students were more aware of their CPA total score, clinical performance examination (CPX) total score, score of each CPX station, section score for the CPX station, history taking section score, physical examination section score, and doctor-patient relationship section score. Moreover, students became more convinced of their own weaknesses from their history taking and patient education section after viewing video feedback than before.
conclusionThe use of the video feedback system might help students recognize their CPA results and identify their strengths and weaknesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.