Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286937›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices of women aged at least 25 years in Harare, Zimbabwe.

O Tapera, G Dreyer, W Kadzatsa, A M Nyakabau, B Stray-Pedersen, Hendricks Sjh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early cervical cancer screening: The influence of culture and religion.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Mapping Evidence on Management of Cervical Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

O TaperaSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. oscar.tapera@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5916-4745
G DreyerGynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
W KadzatsaRadiotherapy Centre, Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, Harare, Zimbabwe.
A M NyakabauRadiotherapy Centre, Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, Harare, Zimbabwe.
B Stray-PedersenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University in Oslo and Womens' Clinic, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.
Hendricks SjhFaculty of Dentistry and Oral Health Hospital, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Parirenyatwa Hospital · ZWUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of Fort Hare · ZAUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the most common cancer and a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women in Zimbabwe yet it is preventable, early detectable and highly curable. The objective of this study was to investigate knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices towards cervical cancer, its prevention and treatment in Harare, Zimbabwe.

methodsSequential explanatory mixed methods approach consisting of analytical cross sectional survey and a qualitative inquiry was used. Study population consisted of women with cervical cancer, health workers and other stakeholders who are involved in cancer control programmes. Patient survey data were collected using validated structured questionnaire in Surveytogo software in an android tablet. Qualitative study used key informant interviews to understand survey findings better. Data analyses for the survey involved univariate and multivariate analyses using STATA version 14. For qualitative study, themes in transcripts were coded and analyzed using Dedoose software to generate evidence for the study.

resultsParticipants reported different levels of knowledge of causes (23%), risk factors (71%), prevention (72%), screening (73%) and treatment (80%) of cervical cancer. Knowledge of causes of cervical cancer were negatively associated with: being aged 45 or more years (OR = 0.02; p = 0.004), having no household income (OR = 0.02;p = 0.007), household income <US$600 per month (OR = 0.02; p = 0.015), middle class wealth (OR = 0.01;p = 0.032), watching TV daily (OR = 0.01;p = 0.007) and 1-6 times per week (OR = 0.02; p = 0.045). Knowledge of causes of cervical cancer were also positively associated with listening to radio daily (OR = 394, CI: 11.02-1406) (p = 0.001) and 1-6 times a week (OR = 100, CI: 2.95-3364) (p = 0.010). Knowledge of prevention was only positively associated with listening to the radio daily (OR = 77, CI: 1.89-3114) (p = 0.022) and 1-6 times a week (OR = 174, CI: 2.42-1255) (p = 0.018). Major drivers of lack of knowledge for cervical cancer were: limited awareness programmes, lack of knowledge among health workers, donor prioritization of infectious diseases, infancy of cervical cancer interventions, negative attitudes towards cervical cancer and misconceptions.

conclusionsThis study revealed that knowledge of causes and prevention of cervical cancer was associated with frequent radio listenership. Strengthening of health education through the packaging of messages targeting the wider society using different delivery channels is thus recommended.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsZimbabweAttitudesBeliefsCervical cancerHarareKnowledgePracticesPreventionRisk factorsSequential explanatory mixed methodsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31286937
PMCPMC6615311
OpenAlexW2961186815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.