Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286934›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Health facility preparedness for cholera outbreak response in four cholera-prone districts in Cameroon: a cross sectional study.

Jerome Ateudjieu, Martin Ndinakie Yakum, Andre Pascal Goura, Sonia Sonkeng Nafack, Anthony Njimbia Chebe, Joliette Nguefack Azakoh, Benjamin Azike Chukuwchindun, Eugene Joel Bayiha, Corine Kangmo, Gnodjom Victorin Boris Tachegno and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jerome AteudjieuM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Martin Ndinakie YakumM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon. martinyakum@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3149-2020
Andre Pascal GouraM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Sonia Sonkeng NafackM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Anthony Njimbia ChebeM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Joliette Nguefack AzakohM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Benjamin Azike ChukuwchindunM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Eugene Joel BayihaM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Corine KangmoM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Gnodjom Victorin Boris TachegnoM.A. SANTE (Meilleur accès aux soins de Santé), P.O. Box 33490, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Anne-Cécile Zoung Kanyi BissekDivision of Health Operations Research, Ministry of Public Health, Dschang, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of cholera outbreak remains high in Cameroon. This is because of the persistent cholera outbreaks in neighboring countries coupled with the poor hygiene and sanitation conditions in Cameroon. The objective of this study was to assess the readiness of health facilities to respond to cholera outbreak in four cholera-prone districts in Cameroon. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted targeting all health facilities in four health districts, labeled as cholera hotspots in Cameroon in August 2016. Data collection was done by interview with a questionnaire and by observation regarding the availability of resources and materials for surveillance and case management, access to water, hygiene, and sanitation. Data analysis was descriptive with STATA 11. PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 134 health facilities were evaluated, most of which (108/134[81%]) were urban facilities. The preparedness regarding surveillance was limited with 13 (50%) health facilities in the Far North and 22(20%) in the Littoral having cholera case definition guide. ORS for Case management was present in 8(31%) health facilities in the Far North and in 94(87%) facilities in the littoral. Less than half of the health facilities had a hand washing protocol and 7(5.1%) did not have any source of drinking water or relied on unimproved sources like lake. A total of 4(3.0%) health facilities, all in the Far North region, did not have a toilet.

conclusionsThe level of preparedness of health facilities in Cameroon for cholera outbreak response presents a lot of weaknesses. These are present in terms of lack of basic surveillance and case management materials and resources, low access to WaSH. If not addressed now, these facilities might not be able to play their role in case there is an outbreak and might even turn to be transmission milieus.

Indexed as

CameroonCase ManagementCholeraCross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksHand DisinfectionHealth FacilitiesHealth Services ResearchHumansHygieneObservationSanitationSurveys and QuestionnairesWater SupplyCholeraHealth facilityHygienePreparednessSanitationSurveillanceWaSHWater

Identifiers

PMID31286934
PMCPMC6615310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.