Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286916›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2019

The value of combined vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Cheng Peng, Di Zhou, Lingjun Meng, Yanlong Cao, Hanwen Zhang, Zheng Pan, Chao Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AnAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Serous cystic neoplasm: Do we have to wait till it causes trouble? Season 2.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng PengDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, China.
Di ZhouDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130033, China.
Lingjun MengDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130033, China.
Yanlong CaoDepartment of general surgery, Xi'an No.4 Hospital, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Hanwen ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, China.
Zheng PanDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, China.
Chao LinDepartment of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, China. linchao@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-9136
Union Hospital · CNJilin University · CNWuhan No. 7 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough pancreaticoduodenectomy with vein resection (PDVR) is widely performed in selected patients with indications, its benefits remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDVR in comparison to standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane as well as the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu, and Wanfang databases for studies that evaluate the value of PVDR. The data of the patients who underwent PD or PDVR were analyzed using Review Manager and STATA software.

resultsIn comparison with the PD group, the PDVR group had a lower R0 resection rate and higher rates of complications such as biliary fistula, reoperation rate, delayed gastric emptying, cardiopulmonary abnormalities, hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality. The blood loss, duration of operation, total hospital stay is higher in PDVR group.

conclusionsCompared to standard PD, PDVR was associated with a greater risk of some specific complications and increase the mortality rate, total hospital stay time, combine with vein resection have a lower R0 resection rate. Therefore, combine with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer needs to be carefully selected by the surgeon.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalHumansMesenteric VeinsNeoplasm InvasivenessPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPortal VeinTreatment OutcomeVascular NeoplasmsVascular Surgical ProceduresMeta-analysisPancreatic cancerPancreaticoduodenectomyVein resection

Identifiers

PMID31286916
PMCPMC6615269
OpenAlexW2962472517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.