ArticleBMC surgery2019
A new device to prevent fascial retraction in the open abdomen - proof of concept in vivo.
Article in BMC surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- FasciotensHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as a potential facilitator of definitive fascial closure in the open abdomen: a retrospective study in massive traumatic hemorrhage.Journal of trauma and injury · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Fascial Traction - From Concept to Comprehensive Application.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Complex abdomen: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Early results from the use of an innovative vertical fascial traction system for the management of patients with open abdomen.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Early placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated, fascial reapproximation device improves reduction of the fascial gap in open abdomens: a retrospective cohort study.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
- Evaluating a novel vertical traction device for early closure in open abdomen management: a consecutive case series.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- [Intraoperative fascial traction (IFT) for treatment of large ventral hernias : A retrospective analysis of 50 cases].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Article
- Combining anterior and posterior component separation for extreme cases of abdominal wall reconstruction.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Article
- Intraoperative Fascia Tension as an Alternative to Component Separation. A Prospective Observational Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2020Article
- Prevention of Fascial Retraction in the Open Abdomen with a Novel Device.Case reports in surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn open abdomen is often necessary for survival of patients after peritonitis, compartment syndrome, or in damage control surgery. However, abdominal wall retraction relieves delays and complicates abdominal wall closure. The principle of the newly fascia preserving device (FPD) is the application of anteriorly directed traction on both fascial edges over an external support through a longitudinal beam to relieve increased abdominal pressure and prevent fascial retraction.
methodsTwelve pigs were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups underwent midline laparotomy under general anesthesia. Group one was treated with the new device, group two served as controls. The tension for closing the abdominal fascia was measured immediately after laparotomy as well as at 24 and 48 h. Vital parameters and ventilation pressure were recorded. Post mortem, all fascial tissues were histologically examined.
resultsAll pigs demonstrated increases in abdominal circumference. In both groups, forces for closing the abdomen increased over the observation period. Concerning the central closing force after 24 h we saw a significant lower force in the FPD group (14.4 ± 3 N) vs. control group (21.6 ± 5.7 N, p < 0.001). By testing the main effects using an ANOVA analysis we found a significant group related effect concerning closing force and abdominal circumference of the FDP-group vs. control group (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). The placement of the device on chest and pelvis did not influence vital parameters and ventilation pressure. Histologic exam detected no tissue damage.
conclusionsThis trial shows the feasibility to prevent fascial retraction during the open abdomen by using the new device. Thus, it is expected that an earlier closure of the abdominal wall will be possible, and a higher rate of primary closure will be attained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.