Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286899›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2019

A randomized, double-blind study of the ultrasound assessment of the effect of pharyngeal packing on perioperative gastric volume in nasal surgery.

M Emrah Temel, Tolga Totoz, Kerem Erkalp, Gulen Safiye Temel, Aysin Selcan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819659 (Investigation of the Effect of Pharyngeal Packing on Postoperative Gastric Volume in Patients Undergoing Nasal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819659 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effect of Pharyngeal Packing on Postoperative Gastric Volume in Patients Undergoing Nasal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled180ConditionsAnesthesia, Nasal Surgery, Pharyngeal Packing, Gastric VolumeArmsPharyngeal packing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Emrah TemelTekirdag Corlu State Hospital, Corlu, Turkey.
Tolga TotozNisantasi University, Istanbul Safak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kerem ErkalpHealth Sciences University, Istanbul Bagcılar Training and Educational Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. keremerkalp@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-7092
Gulen Safiye TemelTekirdag Corlu State Hospital, Corlu, Turkey.
Aysin SelcanHealth Sciences University, Istanbul Bagcılar Training and Educational Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharyngeal packing (PP) is commonly performed to reduce the incidence of perioperative blood ingestion (PBI) in nasal surgery (NS), and thus the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study examined the effects of PP on the perioperative gastric volume (GV) and PONV in patients undergoing NS, by ultrasound assessment.

methodsPatients undergoing elective NS [septoplasty, septo-rhinoplasty (SRP) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)] were randomised to receive or not receive PP. In the PP group, pharyngeal packs were placed after the orotracheal intubation. Ultrasound assessments were performed for all patients preoperatively (before the anaesthesia induction) and postoperatively (before the extubation). The antero-posterior (AP) and cranio-caudal (CC) antral diameters, antral cross-sectional area (ACSA), and total GV were calculated. PONV incidence and severity were rated. These variables were compared between timepoints and groups, and in the subgroup analyses according to the surgery type. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess correlations between the variables.

resultsAP and CC diameters and ACSAs were greater postoperatively than preoperatively in the PP and non-PP groups (n = 44 each; all p < 0.05). Postoperative AP and CC diameters and the ACSA were greater in the non-PP than in the PP group (all p < 0.05). Postoperative AP diameters were greater than preoperatively in patients undergoing SRP and FESS, and the postoperative CC diameter and ACSA were greater than preoperatively in patients undergoing SRP (all p < 0.05). Surgery duration was correlated positively with postoperative AP diameter (r = 0.380, p < 0.05), CC diameter (r = 0.291, p < 0.05), and ACSA (r = 0.369, p < 0.05). Patients who underwent septoplasty surgery, PP was decreased PONV incidence and severity at the first four hours, postoperatively (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe study findings indicate that PP reduces the increase in the perioperative GV due to PBI in an elective NS. It is therefore a useful and safe means of reducing the risk of perioperative pulmonary aspiration in such surgeries.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCT), ACTRN12619000487112 , 25/03/2019, Trial registration retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Nasal Surgical ProceduresPharynxTampons, SurgicalAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMaleOperative TimePostoperative Nausea and VomitingStomachUltrasonographyGastric volumePharyngeal packingPostoperative nausea and vomitingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31286899
PMCPMC6615168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.