Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286872›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Intra-abdominal infection (IAI) following cesarean section: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral hospital in Egypt.

Ahmed R Abdelraheim, Khaled Gomaa, Emad M Ibrahim, Mo'men M Mohammed, Eissa M Khalifa, Ayman M Youssef, Ahmed K Abdelhakeem, Heba Hassan, Ahmed Abd Alghany, Saad El Gelany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmed R AbdelraheimDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. arabdelraheim@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-1825
Khaled GomaaDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Emad M IbrahimDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Mo'men M MohammedDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Eissa M KhalifaDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Ayman M YoussefDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Ahmed K AbdelhakeemDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Heba HassanDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Ahmed Abd AlghanyDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Saad El GelanyDepartment of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Minia Maternity & Children University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of post cesarean intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and the independent risk factors associated with it were retrospectively studied at a tertiary referral hospital in Egypt.

methodsThe study targeted the period between January 2014 and December 2017 (4 years) at Minia University Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology (a tertiary referral hospital), Minia Governorate, Egypt. All cases that developed IAI following cesarean section (CS) during the study period were included (408 cases, which served as the case group); in addition, 1300 cases that underwent CS during the study period and were not complicated by IAI or surgical site Infection (SSI) were randomly chosen from the records (control group). The records of cases and controls were compared and bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for IAI.

resultsDuring the studied period, there were 35,500 deliveries in the hospital, and 14200 cases (40%) of these were by cesarean section, producing a rate of 40%. The incidence of IAI post CS was 2.87%, and the mortality rate was 1.2% (due to septicemia). The most identifiable risk factors for IAI were chorioamnionitis (AOR 9.54; 95% CI =6.15-16.2; p ≤ 0.001) and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (AOR 7.54; 95% CI =5.69-10.24; p ≤ 0.001). Risk factors also included: prolonged duration of CS >  1 h (AOR 3.42; 95% CI =2.45-5.23; p = 0.005), no antenatal care (ANC) visits (AOR 3.14; 95% CI =2.14-4.26; p = 0.003), blood loss > 1000 ml (AOR 2.86; 95% CI =2.04-3.92; p = 0.011), emergency CS (AOR 2.24; 95% CI =1.78-3.29; p = 0.016), prolonged labor ≥24 h. (AOR 1.76; 95% CI =1.26-2.27; p = 0.034) and diabetes mellitus (AOR 1.68; 95% CI =1.11-2.39; p = 0.021).

conclusionsThe incidence of IAI post CS in our hospital was 2.87%. Identification of predictors and risk factors for IAI is an important preventive measure.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesEgyptFemaleHumansIncidenceIntraabdominal InfectionsLogistic ModelsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionTertiary Care CentersYoung AdultCesarean sectionIntra-abdominal infectionPredictorsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31286872
PMCPMC6615272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.