Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286726›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2019

Perspective review of optical imaging in welfare assessment in animal-based research.

Carina Pereira, Janosch Kunczik, André Bleich, Christine Haeger, Fabian Kiessling, Thomas Thum, René Tolba, Ute Lindauer, Stefan Treue, Michael Czaplik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carina PereiraRWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.
Janosch KunczikRWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.
André BleichMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Christine HaegerMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Fabian KiesslingRWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.
Thomas ThumMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
René TolbaRWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.
Ute LindauerRWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.
Stefan TreueGeorg-August-Univ. Göttingen, Germany.
Michael CzaplikRWTH Aachen Univ., Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To refine animal research, vital signs, activity, stress, and pain must be monitored. In chronic studies, some measures can be assessed using telemetry sensors. Although this methodology provides high-precision data, an initial surgery for device implantation is necessary, potentially leading to stress, wound infections, and restriction of motion. Recently, camera systems have been adapted for animal research. We give an overview of parameters that can be assessed using imaging in the visible, near-infrared, and thermal spectrum of light. It focuses on heart activity, respiration, oxygen saturation, and motion, as well as on wound analysis. For each parameter, we offer recommendations on the minimum technical requirements of appropriate systems, regions of interest, and light conditions, among others. In general, these systems demonstrate great performance. For heart and respiratory rate, the error was <4  beats  /  min and 5 breaths/min. Furthermore, the systems are capable of tracking animals during different behavioral tasks. Finally, studies indicate that inhomogeneous temperature distribution around wounds might be an indicator of (pending) infections. In sum, camera-based techniques have several applications in animal research. As vital parameters are currently only assessed in sedated animals, the next step should be the integration of these modalities in home-cage monitoring.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicOptical ImagingVideo RecordingAnimalsHeart RateLaboratory Animal ScienceMiceMovementOxygenRatsThermographyWound HealingOxygenanimal researchheart ratemotion activityoxygen saturationrefinementremote monitoringrespiratory ratewound monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31286726
PMCPMC6995877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.