Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286471›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2020

Psoriasis treat to target: defining outcomes in psoriasis using data from a real-world, population-based cohort study (the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register, BADBIR).

S K Mahil, N Wilson, N Dand, N J Reynolds, C E M Griffiths, R Emsley, A Marsden, I Evans, R B Warren, D Stocken and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

S K MahilSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-4913-1522
N WilsonInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
N DandDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, London, U.K.
N J ReynoldsDermatological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
C E M GriffithsDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, U.K.
R EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, U.K.
A MarsdenCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3955-2649
I EvansDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, U.K.
R B WarrenDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, U.K.
D StockenClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
J N BarkerSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
A D BurdenInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.
C H SmithSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-1144
BADBIR study group and the PSORT consortium
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBInstitute of Infection and Immunity · CAManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNewcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14119Medical Research Council MC_PC_15059Medical Research Council MR/L011808/1Medical Research Council MR/N005872/1Medical Research Council MR/S003126/1Medical Research Council MR/T02383X/1NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at King's College London/Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research CentreNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'treat to target' paradigm improves outcomes and reduces costs in chronic disease management but is not yet established in psoriasis.

objectivesTo identify treatment targets in psoriasis using two common measures of disease activity: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA).

methodsData from a multicentre longitudinal U.K. cohort of patients with psoriasis receiving systemic or biologic therapies (British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register, BADBIR) were used to identify absolute PASI thresholds for 90% (PASI 90) and 75% (PASI 75) improvements in baseline disease activity, using receiver operating characteristic curves. The relationship between PGA (clear, almost clear, mild, moderate, moderate-severe, severe) and PASI (range 0-72) was described, and the concordance between absolute and relative definitions of response was determined. The same approach was used to establish treatment response and eligibility definitions based on PGA.

resultsData from 13 422 patients were available (58% male, 91% white ethnicity, mean age 44·9 years), including over 23 000 longitudinal PASI and PGA scores. An absolute PASI ≤ 2 was concordant with PASI 90 and an absolute PASI ≤ 4 was concordant with PASI 75 in 90% and 88% of cases, respectively. These findings were robust to subgroups of timing of assessment, baseline disease severity and treatment modality. PASI and PGA were strongly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0·92). The median PASI increased from 0 (interquartile range 0-0, range 0-23) to 19 (interquartile range 15-25, range 0-64) for PGA clear to severe, respectively. PGA clear/almost clear was concordant with PASI ≤ 2 in 90% of cases, and PGA moderate-severe severe was concordant with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence PASI eligibility criteria for biologics in 81% of cases.

conclusionsAn absolute PASI ≤ 2 and PGA clear/almost clear represent relevant disease end points to inform treat-to-target management strategies in psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? The most commonly used relative disease activity measure in psoriasis is ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90); however, it has several limitations including dependency on a baseline severity assessment. Defining an absolute target disease activity end point in psoriasis has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs, as demonstrated by treat-to-target approaches in other chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. The Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) is a popular alternative measure of psoriasis severity in daily practice; however, its utility has not been formally assessed with respect to PASI. What does this study add? An absolute PASI ≤ 2 corresponds with PASI 90 response and is a relevant disease end point for treat-to-target approaches in psoriasis. There is a strong correlation between PASI and PGA. PGA moderate-severe/severe may serve as an alternative eligibility criterion for biologics to PASI-based definitions, and PGA clear/almost clear is an appropriate alternative absolute treatment end point. What are the clinical implications of this work? Absolute PASI ≤ 2 and PGA clear/almost clear represent relevant disease end points to inform treat-to-target management strategies in psoriasis.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsPsoriasisAdultCohort StudiesDermatologistsEthnicityFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBiological ProductsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID31286471
PMCPMC7317460
OpenAlexW2960529495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.