ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020
Transcranial Photoacoustic Detection of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Following Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Nanoparticle Delivery.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcranial photoacoustic imaging of indocyanine green J-aggregates reveals cerebral signal changes in lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Rigid Hollow Microparticles for Enhanced Focused Ultrasound Treatment Under Optoacoustic Guidance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Recent progress on nanotechnologies for enhancing blood-brain barrier permeability.Smart molecules : open access · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-responsive nanoparticles for imaging and therapy of brain tumors.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Bi-modal confirmation of liposome delivery to the brain after focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening.Heliyon · 2024Article
- A Study of Hyaluronic Acid's Theoretical Reactivity and of Magnetic Nanoparticles Capped with Hyaluronic Acid.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Shedding light on ultrasound in action: Optical and optoacoustic monitoring of ultrasound brain interventions.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Cholesterol Thickness of Blood Vessels Using Photoacoustic Technology.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption for Drug Delivery: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes from Preclinical and Clinical Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Nanotherapeutics in Neuropathologies: Obstacles, Challenges and Recent Advancements in CNS Targeted Drug Delivery Systems.Current neuropharmacology · 2021Article
- Focused Ultrasound for Immunomodulation of the Tumor Microenvironment.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBlood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) is of interest for treating neurodegenerative diseases and tumors by enhancing drug delivery. Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a powerful method to alleviate BBB challenges; however, the detection of BBB opening by non-invasive methods remains limited. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate that 3D transcranial color Doppler (3DCD) and photoacoustic imaging (PAI) combined with custom-made nanoparticle (NP)-mediated FUS delivery can detect BBBD in mice. PROCEDURES: We use MRI and stereotactic ultrasound-mediated BBBD to create and confirm four openings in the left hemisphere and inject intravenously indocyanine green (ICG) and three sizes (40 nm, 100 nm, and 240 nm in diameter) of fluorophore-labeled NPs. We use PAI and fluorescent imaging (FI) to assess the spatial distribution of ICG/NPs in tissues.
resultsA reversible 41 ± 12 % (n = 8) decrease in diameter of the left posterior cerebral artery (PCA) relative to the right after FUS treatment is found using CD images. The spectral unmixing of photoacoustic images of the in vivo (2 h post FUS), perfused, and ex vivo brain reveals a consistent distribution pattern of ICG and NPs at *FUS locations. Ex vivo spectrally unmixed photoacoustic images show that the opening width is, on average, 1.18 ± 0.12 mm and spread laterally 0.49 ± 0.05 mm which correlated well with the BBB opening locations on MR images. In vivo PAI confirms a deposit of NPs in tissues for hours and potentially days, is less sensitive to NPs of lower absorbance at a depth greater than 3 mm and too noisy with NPs above an absorbance of 85.4. FI correlates well with ex vivo PAI to a depth of 3 mm in tissues for small NPs and 4.74 mm for large NPs.
conclusions3DCD can monitor BBBD over time by detecting reversible anatomical changes in the PCA. In vivo 3DPAI at 15 MHz combined with circulating ICG and/or NPs with suitable properties can assess BBB opening 2 h post FUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.