In vitro antioxidant enzyme activity and sperm motility at different temperatures in sterlet Acipenser ruthenus and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss.

Hadiseh Dadras, Viktoriya Dzyuba, Amin Golpour, Miaomiao Xin, Borys Dzyuba

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

Aquaponics as a Promising Strategy to Mitigate Impacts of Climate Change on Rainbow Trout Culture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
Review
Sperm antioxidant system in ocellate river stingray Potamotrygon motoro at transition from seminal vesicle to cloaca.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2020
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hadiseh DadrasFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemia in Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zátiší728/II, 389 25, Vodňany, Czech Republic. dadras@frov.jcu.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1379-2310

Viktoriya DzyubaFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemia in Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zátiší728/II, 389 25, Vodňany, Czech Republic.

Amin GolpourState Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Innovation Academy for Seed Design, Wuhan, 430072, China.

Miaomiao XinFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemia in Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zátiší728/II, 389 25, Vodňany, Czech Republic.

Borys DzyubaFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemia in Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zátiší728/II, 389 25, Vodňany, Czech Republic.

University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

CENAKVA II LO1205 under the NPU I programGrant Agency of the University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice (125/2016/Z)Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic CENAKVA II (No. LO1205 under the NPU I programMinistry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024NAZV QK1710310Reproductive and Genetic Procedures for Preserving Fish Biodiversity CZ.02.1.01./0.0/0.0/16_025/0007370

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influence of in vitro temperature on sperm antioxidant enzyme activity, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) content and motility parameters was evaluated in sterlet Acipenser ruthenus and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Sperm activation was conducted at 4, 14 and 24 °C in both species. Duration of motility was significantly longer at 4 °C than at 14 and 24 °C in both species. At 60 s post-activation, the velocity of sterlet spermatozoa was highest at 24 °C. This trend continued to 420 s post-activation. In rainbow trout, at 10 s post-activation, the highest velocity was observed at 14 °C. Significantly higher catalase activity was seen at 4 °C in both species. No significant difference in spermatozoon superoxide dismutase activity among temperatures was observed. In sterlet, TBARS content was significantly higher at 24 °C compared to other temperatures, but, in rainbow trout, it was highest at 4 °C. The results presume species-specific level of antioxidant enzyme activity and TBARS content at studied temperatures.

Indexed as

Sperm MotilityTemperatureAnimalsAntioxidantsFishesLipid PeroxidationMaleOncorhynchus mykissSpermatozoaSuperoxide DismutaseThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesAntioxidantsSuperoxide DismutaseThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesAntioxidant enzymeFishSperm functionTemperature

Identifiers

PMID31286338

DOI10.1007/s10695-019-00675-w

OpenAlexW2958892935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.