Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286289›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Japan Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion for the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair tumors, cooperated by Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, First Edition.

Saori Mishima, Hiroya Taniguchi, Kiwamu Akagi, Eishi Baba, Yutaka Fujiwara, Akira Hirasawa, Masafumi Ikeda, Osamu Maeda, Kei Muro, Hiroshi Nishihara and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Targeting the Barriers Driving Immune Exclusion.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Emerging evidence for adapting radiotherapy to immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Saori MishimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Hiroya TaniguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. hirtanig@east.ncc.go.jp.
Kiwamu AkagiDivision of Molecular Diagnosis and Cancer Prevention, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Eishi BabaDepartment of Oncology and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yutaka FujiwaraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira HirasawaDepartment of Clinical Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Masafumi IkedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Osamu MaedaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroshi NishiharaGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Japan.
Tadao TakanoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Katsuya TsuchiharaDepartment of Translational Research, Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi YatabeDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPKeio University · JPKyushu University · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPNagoya University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPOkayama University · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPTohoku University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 18ck0106233h0003Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare public-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel therapeutic agents have improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parallel, the development of predictive biomarkers to identify patients who are likely to benefit from a certain treatment has also contributed to the improvement of survival. Recently, clinical trials have reported the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors. In Japan, a PD-1 inhibitor for dMMR advanced solid tumors, regardless of the primary tumor site, has been approved. However, there are some issues related to administering immune checkpoint inhibitors in the clinical practice setting, making it necessary to develop the guidelines.

methodsClinical questions (CQs) regarding medical care were formulated for patients with dMMR advanced solid tumors, and evidence to the CQs was collected by manual search to prepare recommendations. Then, the committee members voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other factors.

resultsThe current guideline, which we consider a provisional clinical opinion at this point, describes the 11 requirements to be considered in terms of patients for whom dMMR testing is recommended, the timing and methods of dMMR testing, and clinical care systems required to perform dMMR testing properly and to administer immune checkpoint inhibitors safely.

conclusionThis provisional clinical opinion proposes the requirements for performing dMMR testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors and administering them safely.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairHumansImmunotherapyJapanMedical OncologyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptordMMRMismatch repair-deficient advanced solid tumorMSI-HPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitorProvisional clinical opinion

Identifiers

PMID31286289
PMCPMC6989445
OpenAlexW2962268105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.