Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286284›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2019

Autologous Blood Transfusion Enhances Exercise Performance-Strength of the Evidence and Physiological Mechanisms.

Sara Amalie Solheim, Jacob Bejder, Andreas Breenfeldt Andersen, Jakob Mørkeberg, Nikolai Baastrup Nordsborg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Angiogenic Doping: Plausible Yet Difficult to Detect.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara Amalie SolheimDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4589-1711
Jacob BejderDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9188
Andreas Breenfeldt AndersenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3361-3009
Jakob MørkebergAnti Doping Denmark, Brøndby, Denmark.
Nikolai Baastrup NordsborgDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sport Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 13, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. nbn@nexs.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7077-9265
University of Copenhagen · DKAnti Doping Danmark

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review critically evaluates the magnitude of performance enhancement that can be expected from various autologous blood transfusion (ABT) procedures and the underlying physiological mechanisms. The review is based on a systematic search, and it was reported that 4 of 28 studies can be considered of very high quality, i.e. placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover studies. However, both high-quality studies and other studies have generally reported performance-enhancing effects of ABT on exercise intensities ranging from ~70 to 100% of absolute peak oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

Anti-dopingArterial oxygen contentMaximal cardiac outputMaximal oxygen uptakePhlebotomyTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID31286284
PMCPMC6614299
OpenAlexW2959185154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.