Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31286277›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2019

Best Practices in Tele-Teaming: Managing Virtual Teams in the Delivery of Care in Telepsychiatry.

Jay H Shore

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Psychiatrist and Psychologist Experiences with Telehealth and Remote Collaborative Care in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jay H ShoreDepartments of Psychiatry and Family Practice, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13055 East 17th Avenue , CAIANH, F800, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Jay.shore@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewTo review and organize best practices around management of virtual teams for psychiatrists working in team-based telepsychiatry services. RECENT

findingsAn early but evolving literature in telepsychiatric team-based care is beginning to examine the importance of team function. Psychiatrists will increasingly have opportunities to engage in team-based telepsychiatry in evolving models that improve outcomes, enhance quality, and expand access to behavioral health treatments. While the literature is limited in psychiatry and medicine on virtual teams, there is a growing literature from applied psychology and business. This article synthesizes these findings along with lessons learned from the field to provide recommendations for psychiatrists involved in team-based telepsychiatry. Providing this type of care involves mastering the management of virtual teams. Psychiatrists are well positioned to play a distinctive and central leadership role for team-based telepsychiatry.

Indexed as

LeadershipDelivery of Health CareHumansPsychiatryTelemedicineBest practicesMental healthPsychiatryTeam-based careTelepsychiatryVirtual teams

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.